Suppr超能文献

A prediction scoring system to select the surgical treatment of liver cancer. Further refinement based on 10 years of use.

作者信息

Yamanaka N, Okamoto E, Oriyama T, Fujimoto J, Furukawa K, Kawamura E, Tanaka T, Tomoda F

机构信息

First Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 1994 Apr;219(4):342-6. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199404000-00003.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study reports further refinement of a prediction scoring system, which was established in 1980 as a guide to determine a safe limit for hepatectomy, based on 10 years of use.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

In the past, whether major resection was safe was judged empirically from the net resection volume or the residual hepatic volume combined with the patient's liver function. However, such judgment was not based on objectively defined criteria.

METHODS

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; n = 376) and metastatic cancer (n = 58) who had hepatectomy at some time from 1981 through 1990 were entered into this study. A prediction score (PS) was computed using a multiple regression equation that consists of computed tomographic scan-estimated resection rate, indocyanine green retention rate, and the patient's age. A PS greater than 55 was classified as a risky zone, a PS of 45 to 55 was considered borderline and a PS less than 45 was a safe zone.

RESULTS

With HCC and chronic liver disease, all patients in the risky zone died, whereas 33% in the borderline zone died and 7.3% died who were in the safe zone. With metastatic cancer with normal liver, all patients in the risky zone died, whereas no patient in either the borderline or safe zones died. The major cause of death in the risky zone was liver failure due to excessive resection. In the borderline and safe zones, liver failure developed primarily after abdominal sepsis or pulmonary infection, particularly for those with adverse prognostic factors such as disturbed glucose tolerance, lower platelet count, and higher indocyanine green retention rate.

CONCLUSION

Prediction scores can eliminate deaths related to excessive resection for patients with normal or injured livers. When patients have adverse prognostic factors, careful surgery and postoperative management is mandatory to avoid liver failure triggered by intra- or extra-abdominal sepsis, even if the score remains in a borderline or safe zone.

摘要

相似文献

2
[A new prognostic score system of hepatocellular carcinoma following hepatectomy].
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 23;39(12):903-909. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.12.005.
5
A new scoring system for assessment of liver function after successful hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2011 Jun;10(3):265-9. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(11)60044-1.
6
8
Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Results of 229 consecutive patients during 11 years.
Ann Surg. 1993 Apr;217(4):375-84. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199304000-00009.
9
Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in diameter of > or = 10 cm.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 Mar-Apr;49(44):518-23.
10
Significant impact of patient age on outcome after liver resection for HCC in cirrhosis.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Feb;40(2):208-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.10.018. Epub 2013 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

2
Intraoperatively measured prehepatectomy portal vein pressure as a useful predictor of posthepatectomy liver failure.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Oct 21;409(1):314. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03508-4.
3
Zinc supports liver regeneration after partial resection.
Turk J Surg. 2023 Dec 29;39(4):344-353. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.6260. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Cardiac Metastasis After Curative Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Assessment of Risk Factors, Treatment Options, and Prognosis.
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2022 Jul 18;9(3):181-184. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1878. eCollection 2022 Summer.
7
Modification of ALPPS to avoid ischemia and congestion after stage 1: a case report.
Surg Case Rep. 2022 Jul 22;8(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s40792-022-01490-x.
10
Update on perioperative management of patients undergoing surgery for liver cancer.
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021 Dec 15;6(3):344-354. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12529. eCollection 2022 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Major and minor segmentectomies "réglées" in liver surgery.
World J Surg. 1982 Jan;6(1):10-24. doi: 10.1007/BF01656369.
2
A multiple regression equation for prediction of posthepatectomy liver failure.
Ann Surg. 1984 Nov;200(5):658-63. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198411000-00018.
4
The surgical management of primary carcinoma of the liver.
World J Surg. 1982 Jan;6(1):66-75. doi: 10.1007/BF01656375.
6
Primary hepatic carcinoma resection over 18 years.
Chin Med J (Engl). 1980 Oct;93(10):723-8.
7
Physiologic considerations in major hepatic resections.
Am J Surg. 1969 Jan;117(1):78-84. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(69)90288-8.
8
Surgical therapy of primary liver tumors.
Recent Results Cancer Res. 1986;100:197-211. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-82635-1_26.
9
Nonanatomic hepatic resection for secondary hepatic tumors with special reference to hemostatic technique.
Arch Surg. 1988 Sep;123(9):1063-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400330039005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验