Powe N R, Griffiths R I, Watson A J, Anderson G F, de Lissovoy G, Greer J W, Herbert R J, Milam R A, Whelton P K
Division of Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 1994 Jan;4(7):1455-65. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V471455.
To examine the effects of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) on hospital utilization, hospital costs, and Medicare reimbursements for hospital care, a longitudinal, matched cohort study was conducted using Medicare claims data of 23,806 Medicare-eligible, dialysis patients who received rHuEPO, did not have a transplant, and were alive for 18 mo or longer and 22,720 controls matched on age, sex, race, cause of ESRD, and dialysis modality. The relative odds (rHuEPO versus control) of admission for all causes and for specific causes over 9 mo, adjusted for admission in the prior 9 mo and the per patient change in total admissions, inpatient days, hospital costs, and Medicare hospital payments between the prior 9-mo period and the subsequent 9-mo period was examined. The adjusted relative odds (95% confidence interval) of admission (rHuEPO versus control) was: higher and statistically significant for all causes, 1.08 (1.03 to 1.14); seizure, 1.52 (1.28 to 1.75); vascular access revision, 1.11 (1.06 to 1.17), and heart failure, 1.17 (1.09 to 1.26); higher but not statistically significant for angina, 1.09 (0.99 to 1.20) and stroke, 1.08 (0.86 to 1.31); and lower but not statistically significant for myocardial infarction, 0.91 (0.72 to 1.10); peripheral vascular disease, 0.81 (0.60 to 1.02); anemia, 0.86 (0.56 to 1.17); and depression, 0.89 (0.37 to 1.40). The mean change per 1,000 patients in admissions was less by 38 (P = 0.03) because of fewer readmissions, and in days was 1,309 less (P < 0.001), for patients treated with rHuEPO versus controls. The mean change per patient in hospital costs was $371 less and was statistically significant (P = 0.03) and in Medicare hospital payments was $132 less but was not statistically significant (P = 0.43) for patients treated with rHuEPO versus controls. rHuEPO was associated with an increase in the probability of hospital admission (particularly admissions potentially related to adverse effects) but a decrease in readmissions, overall admissions, hospital days, and cost to hospitals in this cohort of patients surviving for 18 mo. Although not realized short term, Medicare savings from potential rHuEPO-related reductions in hospital care may be long term through future adjustments in diagnosis-related group-based hospital payment.
为研究重组人促红细胞生成素(rHuEPO)对医院利用率、医院成本以及医院护理的医疗保险报销的影响,我们进行了一项纵向匹配队列研究,使用了23,806名符合医疗保险条件、接受rHuEPO治疗、未进行移植且存活18个月或更长时间的透析患者的医疗保险理赔数据,以及22,720名在年龄、性别、种族、终末期肾病病因和透析方式方面相匹配的对照患者的数据。我们研究了在调整了前9个月的入院情况以及每位患者在前9个月期间和随后9个月期间总入院次数、住院天数、医院成本和医疗保险医院支付的变化后,rHuEPO组与对照组在9个月内所有原因及特定原因入院的相对比值(rHuEPO组与对照组相比)。rHuEPO组与对照组相比,调整后的入院相对比值(95%置信区间)为:所有原因入院的比值更高且具有统计学意义,为1.08(1.03至1.14);癫痫发作,1.52(1.28至1.75);血管通路修复,1.11(1.06至1.17),以及心力衰竭,1.17(1.09至1.26);心绞痛,1.09(0.99至1.20)和中风,1.08(0.86至1.31)的比值更高但无统计学意义;心肌梗死,0.91(0.72至1.10);外周血管疾病,0.81(0.60至1.02);贫血,0.86(0.56至1.17);以及抑郁症,0.89(0.37至1.40)的比值更低但无统计学意义。与对照组相比,接受rHuEPO治疗的患者每1000例患者的入院次数平均减少38次(P = 0.03),这是因为再入院次数减少,住院天数平均减少1309天(P < 0.001)。与对照组相比,接受rHuEPO治疗的患者每位患者的医院成本平均减少371美元,具有统计学意义(P = 0.03),医疗保险医院支付平均减少132美元,但无统计学意义(P = 0.43)。在这一存活18个月的患者队列中,rHuEPO与住院概率增加(特别是可能与不良反应相关的入院)相关,但与再入院次数、总入院次数减少、住院天数减少以及医院成本降低相关。尽管短期内未实现,但通过未来基于诊断相关组的医院支付调整,rHuEPO可能带来的医院护理减少所节省的医疗保险费用可能是长期的。