Walraven G E, Mkanje R J, van Roosmalen J, van Dongen P W, Dolmans W M
Sumve Designated District Hospital, Mwanza Region, Tanzania.
Trop Geogr Med. 1994;46(1):14-6.
This study examines the value of head-, chest- and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), and crown-to-coccyx length as a screening method for low birth weight. Results are presented of 2,710 consecutive live births, excluding infants with severe congenital abnormalities. Chest circumference (r = 0.84) and MUAC (r = 0.79) correlated best with birth weight. Variance in birth weight was explained by chest circumference in 70%, while a model including all variables accounted for 79%. At a cut-off level of 30.0 cm for chest circumference, detection rate for birth weight below 2,500 g and 2,000 g was 67% and 96%, respectively, while false-positive rate was 3 and 10%. At a cut-off level of 9.0 cm for MUAC, detection rate for birth weight below 2,500 and 2,000 g was 72% and 95%, respectively, while false-positive rate was 8% and 15%. Chest circumference is recommended as the first stage screening method of choice for LBW, when no weighing scale is available.
本研究探讨了头围、胸围和上臂中部周长(MUAC)以及顶臀长作为低出生体重筛查方法的价值。研究给出了2710例连续活产儿的结果,不包括患有严重先天性异常的婴儿。胸围(r = 0.84)和MUAC(r = 0.79)与出生体重的相关性最佳。出生体重的方差有70%可由胸围解释,而包含所有变量的模型可解释79%。胸围截断值为30.0 cm时,出生体重低于2500 g和2000 g的检出率分别为67%和96%,假阳性率分别为3%和10%。MUAC截断值为9.0 cm时,出生体重低于2500 g和2000 g的检出率分别为72%和95%,假阳性率分别为8%和15%。当没有体重秤时,建议将胸围作为低出生体重的首选一级筛查方法。