Suppr超能文献

述情障碍与健康控制点是否不同?

Is alexithymia distinct from health locus of control?

作者信息

Wise T N, Mann L S

机构信息

Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia.

出版信息

Int J Psychiatry Med. 1993;23(4):339-47. doi: 10.2190/99DA-YKMU-4N1T-1VRF.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Both locus of control and alexithymia have been considered personality factors fostering health concerns and behaviors. This study investigates the relationship between the health locus of control and alexithymia.

METHOD

Seventy-eight psychiatric outpatients were administered the Wallston Health Locus of Control Scale (HLC), the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (HLC), and the Five Factor Inventory, which measures neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. Depressive and anxious affect was also measured. Regression models were developed to assess the influence of the above variables upon alexithymia.

RESULTS

Although there was a significant bivariant correlation between an external locus of control and increased alexithymia, regression models found that HLC did not significantly predict TAS. Neuroticism, however, provided the most significant contribution to predict increased alexithymia.

CONCLUSION

Neuroticism may link HLC and TAS due to the face validity of each construct. A sense of vulnerability is stated in each measure. This may foster somatic preoccupation. The data suggest HLC and TAS to be separate phenomena and further support the validity of alexithymia as a unique personality trait.

摘要

目的

控制点和述情障碍均被视为促进健康相关担忧和行为的人格因素。本研究调查健康控制点与述情障碍之间的关系。

方法

对78名精神科门诊患者施测沃尔斯顿健康控制点量表(HLC)、多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS)以及测量神经质、外向性、开放性、宜人性和尽责性的五因素问卷。同时测量抑郁和焦虑情绪。建立回归模型以评估上述变量对述情障碍的影响。

结果

尽管外部控制点与述情障碍增加之间存在显著的双变量相关性,但回归模型发现HLC并不能显著预测TAS。然而,神经质对预测述情障碍增加的贡献最为显著。

结论

由于每种结构的表面效度,神经质可能将HLC和TAS联系起来。每种测量中都表明存在一种脆弱感。这可能会促进对躯体的过度关注。数据表明HLC和TAS是不同的现象,并进一步支持述情障碍作为一种独特人格特质的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验