Karjalainen J, Viitasalo M, Mänttäri M, Manninen V
Central Military Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Jun;23(7):1547-53. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90654-8.
The aim of this study was to establish the relation between QT intervals and a wide range of rest heart rates in men. These data provided the basis of a simple method for adjusting the QT interval for heart rate.
Earlier correction equations give conflicting results, especially at low and high heart rates.
The QT intervals were measured in 324 electrocardiograms of healthy young men. The sample was weighted for low and high heart rates. A curve relating QT intervals and heart rates from 40 to 120 beats/min was constructed. The QT interval at 60 beats/min was used as the reference value, and an adjusting nomogram for different heart rates was created. The reliabilities of the nomogram and three earlier QT correction equations were tested in the study group and in 396 middle-aged men.
The nomogram method presented (QTNc = QT + correcting number) adjusted the QT interval most accurately over the whole range of heart rates on the basis of smallest mean-squared residual values between measured and predicted QT intervals. The Fridericia formula (QTFc = QT/RR1/3) gave the best correction at low, but failed at high, heart rates. The linear regression equation (QTLc = QT + 0.154[1 - RR], Framingham Study) was reliable at normal, but failed at low and high, heart rates. The Bazett formula (QTc = QT/RR1/2) performed poorest at all heart rates. The relation between QT and RR intervals was determined by three linear regressions expressing the slopes 0.116 for heart rates < 60 beats/min, 0.156 for heart rates from 60 to 100 beats/min and 0.384 for heart rates > 100 beats/min.
The QT-RR relation over a wide range of heart rates does not permit the use of one simple adjustment equation. A nomogram providing, for every heart rate, the number of milliseconds that the QT interval must be corrected gives excellent adjustment.
本研究旨在确定男性静息心率范围广泛时QT间期之间的关系。这些数据为一种简单的心率校正QT间期方法提供了基础。
早期的校正方程给出了相互矛盾的结果,尤其是在低心率和高心率时。
在324名健康年轻男性的心电图中测量QT间期。对低心率和高心率样本进行加权。构建了一条将QT间期与40至120次/分钟心率相关联的曲线。将60次/分钟时的QT间期用作参考值,并创建了不同心率的校正列线图。在校研组和396名中年男性中测试了列线图和三个早期QT校正方程的可靠性。
所呈现的列线图方法(QTNc = QT + 校正数)基于测量的QT间期与预测的QT间期之间最小的均方残差,在整个心率范围内最准确地校正了QT间期。弗里德里西亚公式(QTFc = QT/RR1/3)在低心率时校正效果最佳,但在高心率时失败。线性回归方程(QTLc = QT + 0.154[1 - RR],弗雷明汉研究)在正常心率时可靠,但在低心率和高心率时失败。巴泽特公式(QTc = QT/RR1/2)在所有心率下表现最差。QT与RR间期之间的关系由三个线性回归确定,心率<60次/分钟时斜率为0.116,心率60至100次/分钟时斜率为0.156,心率>100次/分钟时斜率为0.384。
在广泛的心率范围内,QT-RR关系不允许使用一个简单的校正方程。一个针对每个心率提供QT间期必须校正的毫秒数的列线图可实现出色的校正。