• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[伤寒穿孔的预后因素]

[Prognostic factors in typhoid perforation].

作者信息

Paredes C, Cruz J, Díaz-Plasencia J, Prevost M

机构信息

Departamento de Cirugía del Hospital, Belén de Trujillo, Facultad de Medicina de la U.N.T.

出版信息

Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 1993;13(1):13-9.

PMID:8219097
Abstract

This retrospective study evaluated 112 patients who had undergone surgery by typhoid perforation at the Belen Hospital, Trujillo, Peru, from 1967 trough 1990 in order to identify by univariate analysis the combination of factors predictive of postoperative morbidity and mortality. All the patients had one or more of the following diagnostic criteria: bacteriologic, serologic, anatomopathologic and surgical. The surgical procedures performed were: simple closure (n = 70), intestinal resection in conjunction with primary anastomosis (n = 6), intestinal resection plus ileostomy (n = 33), whilst peritoneal drainage operations were used in 3 cases. The following parameters were evaluated: age, sex, length of history, length of perforation, low intestinal hemorrhage, leukocyte count, type of peritoneal fluid and number of perforations. The operative mortality rate for all patients was 21.4% and morbidity rate was 80.4%. Significant differences in morbidity were only found in patients with perforations over 48 hours (p < 0.05). Analysis of post-operative mortality: length of perforation over 48 hours (p < 0.001), presence of hematochezia (p < 0.01), leukopenia (p < 0.05), fecaloid peritoneal fluid (p < 0.05) or the evidence of 3 or more intestinal perforations (p < 0.05). We concluded that a surgeon must take into account all of these factors to lead to satisfactory results.

摘要

这项回顾性研究评估了1967年至1990年期间在秘鲁特鲁希略贝伦医院因伤寒穿孔接受手术的112例患者,以便通过单因素分析确定预测术后发病率和死亡率的因素组合。所有患者均符合以下一项或多项诊断标准:细菌学、血清学、解剖病理学和手术标准。所实施的手术操作包括:单纯缝合(n = 70)、肠切除并一期吻合(n = 6)、肠切除加回肠造口术(n = 33),另有3例采用了腹腔引流手术。评估了以下参数:年龄、性别、病史时长、穿孔时长、低位肠出血、白细胞计数、腹腔积液类型和穿孔数量。所有患者的手术死亡率为21.4%,发病率为80.4%。仅在穿孔超过48小时的患者中发现发病率存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。术后死亡率分析显示:穿孔时长超过48小时(p < 0.001)、存在便血(p < 0.01)、白细胞减少(p < 0.05)、粪样腹腔积液(p < 0.05)或存在3个或更多肠穿孔(p < 0.05)。我们得出结论,外科医生必须考虑所有这些因素才能取得满意的结果。

相似文献

1
[Prognostic factors in typhoid perforation].[伤寒穿孔的预后因素]
Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 1993;13(1):13-9.
2
[Morbidity and mortality risk factors in patients with ileal typhoid perforation].[回肠型伤寒穿孔患者的发病及死亡风险因素]
Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2006 Jan-Mar;26(1):25-33.
3
[Operative mortality in sigmoid volvulus].
Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 1993;13(1):37-44.
4
Operative management of typhoid ileal perforation in children.儿童伤寒性回肠穿孔的手术治疗
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2010 Jan-Apr;7(1):9-13. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.59351.
5
Typhoid ileal perforation: surgical experience of 64 cases.伤寒性回肠穿孔:64例手术经验
Acta Chir Belg. 2004 Aug;104(4):445-7.
6
The ideal treatment of the typhoid enteric perforation - resection anastomosis.伤寒肠穿孔的理想治疗方法——切除吻合术。
Int Surg. 1999 Jan-Mar;84(1):35-8.
7
Factors effecting morbidity in typhoid intestinal perforation in children.影响儿童伤寒肠穿孔发病率的因素。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2002 Dec;18(8):696-700. doi: 10.1007/s00383-002-0794-3. Epub 2002 Dec 20.
8
Typhoid perforation: factors affecting mortality and morbidity.伤寒穿孔:影响死亡率和发病率的因素
Int Surg. 1982 Oct-Dec;67(4):317-9.
9
Comparison of three operations for typhoid perforation.伤寒穿孔三种手术方式的比较。
Br J Surg. 1997 Apr;84(4):558-9.
10
[Typhus perforation in the tropics. Apropos of 83 cases].[热带地区的斑疹伤寒穿孔。关于83例病例]
J Chir (Paris). 1994 Feb;131(2):90-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Nontraumatic terminal ileal perforation.非创伤性末端回肠穿孔。
World J Emerg Surg. 2006 Mar 24;1:7. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-1-7.
2
Enteric perforation--single-layer closure.肠穿孔——单层缝合。
Dig Dis Sci. 2004 Jan;49(1):161-4. doi: 10.1023/b:ddas.0000011620.56077.97.