Masi G, Marcheschi M, Brovedani P, Pfanner P
Istituto di Neuropsichiatria e Psicopedagogia, Università degli Studi di Pisa.
Minerva Pediatr. 1993 Jun;45(6):235-46.
The study of children with focal brain injury has important implications from a clinical and theoretical perspective. Clinical data on children with congenital or early acquired lesions indicates that the cognitive sequelae are different from those resulting from similar damage sustained in adulthood. These differences depend in part on the differential effect that damage has on ongoing developmental process and in part on the different recovery capacity of the Central Nervous System of the child. From a theoretical perspective, focal lesion data is important for analyzing the issues of early neuropsychological functioning (especially in terms of early hemispheric specialization) and of plasticity and recovery of function of the CNS. This review analyzes the possible causes of this heterogeneity, that seems in part dependent on the interindividual variability of early neuropsychological organization and in part related to methodological factors such subject inclusion criteria and nature of neuropsychological measures. The review also discusses the role during development of the principal inter and intrahemispheric recovery mechanisms (special attention is given to intrahemispheric mechanisms which have been considered in the past as less determinant with respect to interhemispheric mechanisms). Furthermore, the role of lesion side as a prognostic parameter is discussed, specifically in terms of the evidence of a differential recovery capacity of left hemisphere with respect to the right. Various hypotheses have been put forward as possible interpretations of these data (maturational gradient, different neuropsychological organization of the two hemispheres), yet evidence is still controversial. If one considers the prognostic parameter--age of lesion onset--recent evidence does not confirm the hypothesis that the earlier the lesion, the greatest the recovery of function. Rather, it seems that relating age of lesion onset to other parameters, such as lesion side or size, has a greater and more reliable prognostic value. Another aim of the review is to analyze the effect that focal damage has on the dynamics of development. The fact that the effects of early damage might manifest themselves later in development, when the function in question is reaching a higher level of organization, underlines the importance of a longitudinal approach that assesses the developmental patterns of specific functions. Another issue discussed is the role of lesion side in determining specific cognitive impairment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
从临床和理论角度来看,对患有局灶性脑损伤儿童的研究具有重要意义。关于患有先天性或早期获得性脑损伤儿童的临床数据表明,其认知后遗症与成年后遭受类似损伤所导致的后果不同。这些差异部分取决于损伤对正在进行的发育过程的不同影响,部分取决于儿童中枢神经系统不同的恢复能力。从理论角度而言,局灶性损伤数据对于分析早期神经心理功能问题(尤其是早期半球特化方面)以及中枢神经系统的可塑性和功能恢复很重要。本综述分析了这种异质性的可能原因,这种异质性似乎部分取决于早期神经心理组织的个体间差异,部分与诸如受试者纳入标准和神经心理测量性质等方法学因素有关。该综述还讨论了主要的半球间和半球内恢复机制在发育过程中的作用(特别关注过去被认为相对于半球间机制而言决定性较小的半球内机制)。此外,还讨论了损伤部位作为预后参数的作用,具体而言是关于左半球相对于右半球具有不同恢复能力的证据。已经提出了各种假设作为对这些数据的可能解释(成熟梯度、两个半球不同的神经心理组织),但证据仍然存在争议。如果考虑预后参数——损伤发生的年龄——最近的证据并未证实损伤越早功能恢复就越好这一假设。相反,似乎将损伤发生的年龄与其他参数(如损伤部位或大小)相关联具有更大且更可靠的预后价值。本综述的另一个目的是分析局灶性损伤对发育动态的影响。早期损伤的影响可能在发育后期当相关功能达到更高组织水平时才显现出来,这一事实凸显了采用纵向方法评估特定功能发育模式的重要性。讨论的另一个问题是损伤部位在确定特定认知障碍方面的作用。(摘要截取自400字)