Ishikawa K, Saito S
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1976 Jul 9;48(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/BF00423305.
Rats were trained to perform in discrimination learning reinforced by water for 6 days, and were intraperitoneally injected with chlorpromazine, reserpine, or d-amphetamine after each training session. Although chlorpromazine at the dose levels of 0.5 mg/kg or more injected immediately after training impaired learning, the drug did not affect learning when it was injected 60 min after training. Reserpine and amphetamine also impaired learning, but delaying the time intervals between training and injection to 60 min or more had no influence on this learning impairment. Post-trial chlorpromazine and amphetamine had no effect on, but reserpine decreased, motility in the subsequent training session. Chlorpromazine had no effect on water intake in the subsequent session, but reserpine and amphetamine decreased water intake at the dose levels that impaired learning. It was concluded that all three drugs impaired learning, but differed in their effects on learning; chlorpromazine impaired learning by a specific effect on learning itself; reserpine, by a non-specific effect on behavior due to a long acting sedation; and amphetamine, by an effect to decrease the motivation to drink water. The specific effect of chlorpromazine could be related to the hypothesis of "memory trace" synthesis.
大鼠接受训练,通过水强化进行辨别学习,为期6天,每次训练后腹腔注射氯丙嗪、利血平或右旋苯丙胺。尽管训练后立即注射剂量为0.5毫克/千克及以上的氯丙嗪会损害学习,但在训练后60分钟注射该药物则不会影响学习。利血平和苯丙胺也会损害学习,但将训练与注射之间的时间间隔延长至60分钟或更长时间对这种学习损害没有影响。训练后注射氯丙嗪和苯丙胺对随后训练过程中的运动能力没有影响,但利血平会使其降低。氯丙嗪对随后训练过程中的饮水量没有影响,但利血平和苯丙胺在损害学习的剂量水平下会降低饮水量。得出的结论是,这三种药物都会损害学习,但对学习的影响有所不同;氯丙嗪通过对学习本身的特定作用来损害学习;利血平通过长期镇静对行为产生非特异性作用;而苯丙胺则通过降低饮水动机来产生影响。氯丙嗪的特定作用可能与“记忆痕迹”合成假说有关。