Bacci G, Picci P, Ferrari S, Ruggieri P, Casadei R, Tienghi A, Brach del Prever A, Gherlinzoni F, Mercuri M, Monti C
Department of Chemotherapy, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Cancer. 1993 Dec 1;72(11):3227-38. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19931201)72:11<3227::aid-cncr2820721116>3.0.co;2-c.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the most accepted treatment for localized osteosarcoma. This has led to a great improvement in limb-sparing surgery and in disease-free survival. Patients with a good response to preoperative chemotherapy showed a higher disease-free survival rate. Current studies examine the possibility of patients whose limbs could be rescued with a poor necrosis and a reduction of the side effects related to aggressive treatments.
Between September 1986 and December 1989, 164 patients entered the second neoadjuvant study conducted at the Rizzoli Institute, Bologna, Italy, for non-metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremities. Preoperative chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of high-dose methotrexate intravenously (i.v.) followed by cisplatin intraarterially and doxorubicin i.v. After surgery, patients classified as good responders (> 90% tumor necrosis) received three more cycles of these drugs, whereas poor responders (< 90% tumor necrosis) had more chemotherapy, which included ifosfamide and etoposide in addition to the other three drugs.
Limb salvage was performed in 83% of cases. At an average follow-up of 54 months (36-76), 109 patients (66%) were continuously disease-free, 2 died from doxorubicin cardiotoxicity, and 52 experienced metastases and 3 had local recurrence. In two of these three patients, metastases followed local recurrence. The 5-year actuarial continuously disease-free survival rate was 63%, with no differences between good and poor responders. Excluding 20 patients who had major protocol violations, the projected continuous disease-free survival rate was 71%.
With an aggressive neoadjuvant chemotherapy, it is possible to cure more than 60% of nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremities, avoiding amputation in most cases. Ifosfamide and etoposide seem to be effective in patients who did not respond to preoperative chemotherapy.
新辅助化疗是局限性骨肉瘤最被认可的治疗方法。这使得保肢手术和无病生存率有了很大提高。对术前化疗反应良好的患者无病生存率更高。目前的研究探讨了对于坏死程度低但肢体仍可挽救的患者以及减少与积极治疗相关副作用的可能性。
1986年9月至1989年12月期间,164例患者进入了在意大利博洛尼亚里佐利研究所进行的第二项非转移性肢体骨肉瘤新辅助研究。术前化疗包括两个周期的大剂量静脉注射甲氨蝶呤,随后动脉内注射顺铂和静脉注射阿霉素。术后,分类为反应良好者(肿瘤坏死>90%)再接受三个周期的这些药物治疗,而反应不佳者(肿瘤坏死<90%)则接受更多化疗,除了其他三种药物外还包括异环磷酰胺和依托泊苷。
83%的病例进行了保肢手术。平均随访54个月(36 - 76个月),109例患者(66%)持续无病,2例死于阿霉素心脏毒性,52例发生转移,3例局部复发。在这3例患者中的2例中,转移继发于局部复发。5年精算持续无病生存率为63%,反应良好者和反应不佳者之间无差异。排除20例严重违反方案的患者后,预计持续无病生存率为71%。
通过积极的新辅助化疗,有可能治愈超过60%的非转移性肢体骨肉瘤,在大多数情况下避免截肢。异环磷酰胺和依托泊苷似乎对术前化疗无反应的患者有效。