McCourt M E, Blakeslee B
Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105-5075.
Vision Res. 1993 Dec;33(17):2499-507. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90130-o.
In order to assess the contribution of high spatial frequency channels (i.e. local, edge-dependent mechanisms) to the grating induction effect, grating induction magnitude was measured as a function of systematic amounts of blurring of the inducing/test field boundary for four test field heights which spanned a two octave range (0.25-2.0 degrees). Measurements were obtained from two subjects using both the cancelling procedure of McCourt [(1982) Vision Research, 22, 119-134] and a contrast matching paradigm. The two measures yielded similar outcomes: consistent with previous results, both matching and cancelling contrast decreased monotonically with increasing test field height. The effect of blurring the edge was to produce a small (eta 2 = 0.6-5.1%), but significant (P < 0.001), increase in grating induction magnitude. A second experiment utilized the contrast matching paradigm to investigate the effect of edge blur at extreme values (i.e. zero blur and maximum blur) on grating induction magnitude across a four octave range of spatial frequency (0.0625-1.0 c/deg). The results of the matching procedure were again consistent with those obtained previously using the cancelling technique: grating induction magnitude decreased monotonically with increasing spatial frequency. The effect of blurring was to produce a modest (eta 2 = 1.0-2.8%), but significant (P < 0.001), elevation in induction magnitude. These results lead to the conclusion that, unlike some other brightness effects, visual spatial filters selectively sensitive to high spatial frequencies, or to the edges which they sharpen, are not essential for the production of the grating induction effect.
为了评估高空间频率通道(即局部的、依赖边缘的机制)对光栅诱导效应的贡献,在四个跨越两个八度范围(0.25 - 2.0度)的测试场高度下,测量了光栅诱导幅度作为诱导/测试场边界系统模糊量的函数。使用麦考特的抵消程序[(1982)《视觉研究》,22,119 - 134]和对比度匹配范式,从两名受试者身上获取了测量数据。这两种测量方法得出了相似的结果:与先前的结果一致,匹配对比度和抵消对比度都随着测试场高度的增加而单调下降。边缘模糊的效果是使光栅诱导幅度产生了小幅度(η² = 0.6 - 5.1%)但显著(P < 0.001)的增加。第二个实验利用对比度匹配范式,研究了在四个八度空间频率范围(0.0625 - 1.0周/度)内,极端值(即零模糊和最大模糊)下的边缘模糊对光栅诱导幅度的影响。匹配程序的结果再次与先前使用抵消技术获得的结果一致:光栅诱导幅度随着空间频率的增加而单调下降。模糊的效果是使诱导幅度产生了适度(η² = 1.0 - 2.8%)但显著(P < 0.001)的升高。这些结果得出的结论是,与其他一些亮度效应不同,对高空间频率或其锐化的边缘有选择性敏感的视觉空间滤波器,对于光栅诱导效应的产生并非必不可少。