Weber B, Hess G, Koberstein R, Doerr H W
Institut für Medizinische Virologie, Universitätskliniken Frankfurt a. M., Germany.
J Virol Methods. 1993 Oct;44(2-3):251-60. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(93)90060-5.
A new, modular automated ELISA (test 1) for HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibody detection and differentiation (Enzymun-Test Anti HIV-1 + 2; anti HIV 1/2 selective, Boehringer Mannheim) was compared with 3 alternative enzyme immunoassays (Abbott recombinant HIV-1/HIV-2 3rd generation EIA, Abbott (test 2); Enzygnost HIV 1 + 2, Behringwerke (test 3); and Wellcozyme HIV recombinant, Murex (test 4)) and Western blot (New LAV I Blot and New LAV II Blot; Diagnostics Pasteur). 380 serum samples from HIV-1 and HIV-2 seropositive patients at different stages of disease, high risk individuals, patients with conditions unrelated to AIDS and from healthy blood donors were used in this evaluation along with 6 seroconversion panels, 6 serum dilution series and 'tricky' sera (repeatedly positive results in ELISA, but negative or undeterminate in Western blot; n = 67). Using the Western blot as reference assay, the overall sensitivity of the four ELISAs was 100%. Test 4 showed the highest sensitivity for antibody detection in seroconversion and dilution series. A high specificity was achieved with test 1 (100%) and test 2 (99.4%). A relatively high rate of false positive results were obtained with test 2 (n = 12) and test 3 (n = 10) by testing 'tricky' sera or samples obtained from healthy blood donors. In comparison to Western blot, a clear differentiation between HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibody serum samples was achieved with the Enzymun-Test. The results of the present study show that the Enzymun-Test provides reliable selective HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibody detection at a cost which is significantly lower than the costs of Western blot tests. Furthermore, the evaluation of test 1 suggests, that it is a highly specific assay for HIV antibody detection.
一种新型模块化自动化酶联免疫吸附测定法(检测1)用于检测和区分HIV-1和HIV-2抗体(酶免疫检测抗HIV-1 + 2;抗HIV 1/2选择性,勃林格殷格翰公司),与3种替代酶免疫测定法进行了比较(雅培重组HIV-1/HIV-2第3代酶免疫测定法,雅培公司(检测2);酶诺斯特HIV 1 + 2,贝林werke公司(检测3);以及Wellcozyme HIV重组,Murex公司(检测4))和免疫印迹法(新型LAV I印迹法和新型LAV II印迹法;巴斯德诊断公司)。本评估使用了来自处于疾病不同阶段的HIV-1和HIV-2血清阳性患者、高危个体、患有与艾滋病无关疾病的患者以及健康献血者的380份血清样本,以及6个血清转化样本组、6个血清稀释系列和‘棘手’血清(酶联免疫吸附测定法反复呈阳性结果,但免疫印迹法呈阴性或不确定;n = 67)。以免疫印迹法作为参考测定法,这四种酶联免疫吸附测定法的总体灵敏度为100%。检测4在血清转化和稀释系列中抗体检测灵敏度最高。检测1(100%)和检测2(99.4%)具有较高的特异性。通过检测‘棘手’血清或从健康献血者获得的样本,检测2(n = 12)和检测3(n = 10)获得了相对较高的假阳性结果率。与免疫印迹法相比,酶免疫检测法能够清晰区分HIV-1和HIV-2抗体血清样本。本研究结果表明,酶免疫检测法能够以显著低于免疫印迹法检测成本的价格提供可靠的HIV-1和HIV-2抗体选择性检测。此外,对检测1的评估表明,它是一种用于HIV抗体检测的高度特异性测定法。