Suppr超能文献

序贯超滤和不同透析液钠浓度对血液透析期间血管稳定性的作用。

The role of sequential ultrafiltration and varying dialysate sodium on vascular stability during hemodialysis.

作者信息

Po C L, Afolabi M, Raja R M

机构信息

Albert Einstein Medical Center, Kraftsow Division of Nephrology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19141.

出版信息

ASAIO J. 1993 Jul-Sep;39(3):M798-800.

PMID:8268648
Abstract

Hypotension is a very common problem during HD. We studied vascular stability during sequential UF with constant and variable dialysate Na. Ten chronic patients underwent HD using two protocols. Protocol A was sequential UF (50% weight loss in the first hour, 30% in the second, and 20% in the third hour) with a dialysate Na of 140 mEq/L. Protocol B was sequential UF as in protocol A with varying dialysate Na (150 mEq/L in the first hr, 142 in the second, and 137 in the third). BP and pulse were monitored every 30 min. Hct, BUN, creatinine, osmolality, and serum albumin were checked every hour. The plasma volume decreased by 5.3% in protocol A as compared with 1.2% in protocol B, as shown by the Hct values. The decrease in serum osmolality during the first and second hours was more marked in protocol A than in protocol B (p < 0.05), but post-dialysis values were similar. The clinical parameters (UF, BP, pulse rate) and serum Na showed no difference. The intradialytic mannitol infusion was 10 ml/HD and 0, whereas saline was 80 ml/HD and 10 for A and B, respectively. These data suggest: (1) Sequential UF with varying dialysate Na could benefit patients who are hemodynamically unstable. (2) The need for mannitol and saline may be more readily alleviated with protocol B than with protocol A. (3) The beneficial effect of varying dialysate Na with sequential UF may be due to improved plasma refilling and decreased early intradialytic osmolar changes.

摘要

低血压是血液透析期间非常常见的问题。我们研究了在使用恒定和可变透析液钠进行序贯超滤期间的血管稳定性。十名慢性患者采用两种方案进行血液透析。方案A为序贯超滤(第一小时体重减轻50%,第二小时30%,第三小时20%),透析液钠为140 mEq/L。方案B为与方案A相同序贯超滤方式,但透析液钠不同(第一小时150 mEq/L,第二小时142 mEq/L,第三小时137 mEq/L)。每30分钟监测一次血压和脉搏。每小时检查血细胞比容、血尿素氮、肌酐、渗透压和血清白蛋白。如血细胞比容值所示,方案A中血浆量减少了5.3%,而方案B中为1.2%。方案A中第一和第二小时血清渗透压的下降比方案B更明显(p < 0.05),但透析后的值相似。临床参数(超滤量、血压、脉搏率)和血清钠无差异。透析期间甘露醇输注量方案A为10 ml/次血液透析,方案B为0,而生理盐水输注量方案A为80 ml/次血液透析,方案B为10 ml/次血液透析。这些数据表明:(1)采用可变透析液钠的序贯超滤可能使血流动力学不稳定的患者受益。(2)与方案A相比,方案B可能更容易减少甘露醇和生理盐水的需求。(3)可变透析液钠联合序贯超滤的有益效果可能归因于改善了血浆再充盈和减少了透析早期的渗透压变化。

相似文献

3
Plasma refilling during hemodialysis with decreasing ultrafiltration. Influence of dialysate sodium.
ASAIO J. 1994 Jul-Sep;40(3):M423-5. doi: 10.1097/00002480-199407000-00034.
6
Impact of sodium and ultrafiltration profiling on haemodialysis-related hypotension.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Nov;21(11):3231-7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl375. Epub 2006 Sep 5.
10
Haemodynamics and electrolyte balance: a comparison between on-line pre-dilution haemofiltration and haemodialysis.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 Sep;19(9):2354-9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh315. Epub 2004 Jul 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验