Suppr超能文献

由于糖精掺假导致对吗啡产生后天性偏好,但对右旋苯丙胺没有。

Acquired preference for morphine but no d-amphetamine as a result of saccharine adulteration.

作者信息

Hill S Y, Powell B J

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1976 Nov 24;50(3):309-12. doi: 10.1007/BF00426850.

Abstract

Consumption of morphine sulfate and d-amphetamine was studied in two groups of rats. In a choice situation, preference for both drugs remained low after 46 days of drinking. In two additional groups morphine and d-amphetamine solutions were prepared with 1% saccharine. Morphine drinking was significantly increased by saccharine adulteration, whereas drinking of amphetamine solutions decreased. Addition of saccharine to morphine solutions increased drinking in more than a simple additive way. Saccharine facilitates the acquisition of drug-directed behavior. The slope of the acquisition trials for the morphine-saccharine group was significantly different from horizontal (O-slope) and significantly different from the slope found for the morphine without saccharine group.

摘要

在两组大鼠中研究了硫酸吗啡和右旋苯丙胺的消耗量。在选择情境中,经过46天的饮水后,对这两种药物的偏好仍然很低。在另外两组中,用1%的糖精制备了吗啡和右旋苯丙胺溶液。糖精掺杂显著增加了吗啡的饮用量,而苯丙胺溶液的饮用量则减少。向吗啡溶液中添加糖精使饮用量的增加超过了简单的相加方式。糖精促进了药物导向行为的习得。吗啡-糖精组习得试验的斜率与水平斜率(0斜率)显著不同,且与无糖精吗啡组的斜率也显著不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验