Suppr超能文献

通过记忆测试鉴别痴呆与抑郁:一项荟萃分析

Differentiation of dementia and depression by memory tests. A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Lachner G, Engel R R

机构信息

Max-Planck-Institute of Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 1994 Jan;182(1):34-9. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199401000-00007.

Abstract

The many tasks used for clinical memory assessment have not been compared systematically for their usefulness in differentiating dementia and depression in old age. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify those attributes of memory tasks that show high discriminative power. Eighty-nine effect-sizes were calculated out of 16 publications directly comparing demented and depressed patients. Outliers in the effect-size distribution (5% of the highest values) were excluded. The groups could be significantly better differentiated by delayed retrieval tasks rather than immediate retrieval tasks. Tasks with distraction before retrieval reached higher effect sizes than retrieval tasks without distraction. Tasks of high-capacity demand differentiated the groups significantly better than tasks of moderate and low demand. Effect-size magnitude was not influenced by patient characteristics except severity of dementia. Thus, demented and depressed patients may best be differentiated by a memory task that uses delayed retrieval with distraction.

摘要

用于临床记忆评估的众多任务,尚未就其在区分老年痴呆症和抑郁症方面的效用进行系统比较。本荟萃分析的目的是确定那些具有高鉴别力的记忆任务属性。在直接比较痴呆患者和抑郁患者的16篇出版物中计算出了89个效应量。效应量分布中的异常值(最高值的5%)被排除。与即时检索任务相比,延迟检索任务能更显著地区分这两组。检索前有干扰的任务比无干扰的检索任务达到更高的效应量。高容量需求的任务比中低容量需求的任务能更显著地区分这两组。除痴呆症严重程度外,效应量大小不受患者特征影响。因此,痴呆患者和抑郁患者最好通过一项采用有干扰的延迟检索的记忆任务来进行区分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验