Moffatt C A, DeVries A C, Nelson R J
Department of Psychology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218.
J Biol Rhythms. 1993 Fall;8(3):221-32. doi: 10.1177/074873049300800305.
Individuals of many nontropical rodent species restrict breeding to the spring and summer. Seasonal reproductive quiescence putatively reflects the energetic incompatibility of breeding and thermoregulatory activities. However, so-called "out-of-season" breeding occurs in virtually all rodent populations examined, suggesting that the incompatibility can be resolved. Both reproductive inhibition and development of energy-saving adaptations are mediated by environmental photoperiod, but some individuals do not inhibit reproduction in short days. In order to assess the costs and benefits of winter breeding, the present study examined the extent to which male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) and deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) that maintained summer reproductive function in winter-simulated daylengths also maintained summer thermoregulatory adaptations. Circadian locomotor activity patterns, basal metabolic rate, capacity for nonshivering thermogenesis, nest building, body mass, and daily food consumption were compared among short-day (LD 8:16) regressed males, short-day (LD 8:16) nonregressed males, and long-day (LD 16:8) males. Short-day nonregressed deer mice resembled long-day conspecifics in terms of body mass and nest-building activities; however, the locomotor activity pattern of short-day nonregressed deer mice was similar to that of their short-day regressed conspecifics. Short-day nonregressed prairie voles had body masses similar to those of long-day conspecifics. Regardless of their reproductive response to photoperiod, short-day prairie voles reduced their daily food consumption and wheel-running activity, compared to long-day voles. These results suggest that winter breeding has energetic costs, most likely resulting from maintaining a "summer-like" body mass relative to that of reproductively regressed animals. These costs may be ameliorated to some extent by the reduction in locomotor activity and nest-building behavior emitted by short-day animals, regardless of reproductive response to short days. Thus, the occurrence of winter breeding may be the result of sufficient numbers of reproductively photoperiod-nonresponsive morphs in the population and sufficiently mild ambient conditions to permit survival of these larger animals.
许多非热带啮齿动物物种的个体将繁殖限制在春季和夏季。季节性繁殖静止被认为反映了繁殖与体温调节活动在能量上的不相容性。然而,在几乎所有被研究的啮齿动物种群中都出现了所谓的“非季节性”繁殖,这表明这种不相容性是可以解决的。繁殖抑制和节能适应的发展都由环境光周期介导,但一些个体在短日照条件下并不抑制繁殖。为了评估冬季繁殖的成本和收益,本研究考察了在模拟冬季日照长度下保持夏季繁殖功能的雄性草原田鼠(Microtus ochrogaster)和鹿鼠(Peromyscus maniculatus)在多大程度上也保持了夏季的体温调节适应。比较了短日照(LD 8:16)退化雄性、短日照(LD 8:16)未退化雄性和长日照(LD 16:8)雄性之间的昼夜运动活动模式、基础代谢率、非颤抖性产热能力、筑巢行为、体重和每日食物消耗量。短日照未退化的鹿鼠在体重和筑巢活动方面与长日照同种动物相似;然而,短日照未退化的鹿鼠的运动活动模式与其短日照退化的同种动物相似。短日照未退化的草原田鼠的体重与长日照同种动物相似。与长日照田鼠相比,无论它们对光周期的繁殖反应如何,短日照草原田鼠都会减少每日食物消耗量和转轮活动。这些结果表明,冬季繁殖有能量成本,很可能是由于相对于繁殖退化的动物而言,维持“类似夏季”的体重所致。短日照动物的运动活动和筑巢行为的减少可能在一定程度上减轻了这些成本,无论它们对短日照的繁殖反应如何。因此,冬季繁殖的发生可能是由于种群中有足够数量的对光周期不敏感的繁殖形态,以及环境条件足够温和,能够使这些较大的动物存活下来。