McGinn C J, Kinsella T J
Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison.
Curr Probl Cancer. 1993 Sep-Oct;17(5):273-321. doi: 10.1016/0147-0272(93)90012-q.
Nonhypoxic cell radiosensitizers, principally the halogenated pyrimidines and hydroxyurea, have been studied in the laboratory and clinical setting for more than 30 years. Early clinical experience in the 1960s and 1970s with the thymidine analogs 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) and 5-iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) was disappointing because normal tissue toxicity eliminated any potential for therapeutic gain. Inadequate delivery systems for intravenous and intraarterial infusions also contributed to the decline of this strategy. More recently, laboratory investigations have revealed further information regarding the mechanism of IUdR/BUdR radiosensitization. This knowledge provided a rationale for the sequence and timing of drug and radiation exposure, which could be both effective and tolerable. Advancing technology also provided safer infusion devices, and a resurgence in clinical trials combining IUdR or BUdR and radiation resulted. Current laboratory studies are now providing data on tumor cell kinetics, which is being applied to ongoing clinical trials. Fluoropyrimidines, principally 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), were also used in early clinical trials and unlike IUdR/BUdR were found to have significant activity as single agents against a variety of tumor types. The clinical integration of 5-FU and radiation occurred more slowly, but recent trials have demonstrated a therapeutic gain. Improved rates of local control and survival with combined 5-FU and radiation versus radiation alone have now been demonstrated in patients with rectal, esophageal, and anal carcinomas. However, the mechanism of interaction between the fluoropyrimidines and radiation remains uncertain and continues to be investigated with the hope of improved clinical outcome. As the cellular pathways influenced by the halogenated pyrimidines have been defined, the potential for biochemical modulation of these agents has been recognized. Leucovorin, the most commonly applied modulator, has been shown to enhance the activity of 5-FU in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. These studies serve as an example for current trials that use biochemical modulators of IUdR, BUdR, and 5-FU as radiosensitizers. Hydroxyurea, currently used in the treatment of chronic leukemia, has also been considered a radiosensitizer. As with IUdR/BUdR, the clinical trials have often been inconclusive and interest in this radiosensitizer has waned. A poor understanding of the mechanism of action and tumor cell/normal tissue kinetics may be responsible for the lack of overall success with this strategy. Current investigations of cell kinetics in humans and potential mechanisms of hydroxyurea action could provide information critical to future trials of hydroxyurea radiosensitization.
非低氧细胞放射增敏剂,主要是卤代嘧啶和羟基脲,已经在实验室和临床环境中研究了30多年。20世纪60年代和70年代,胸苷类似物5-溴脱氧尿苷(BUdR)和5-碘脱氧尿苷(IUdR)的早期临床经验令人失望,因为正常组织毒性消除了任何治疗获益的可能性。静脉和动脉内输注的给药系统不完善也导致了该策略的衰落。最近,实验室研究揭示了关于IUdR/BUdR放射增敏机制的更多信息。这些知识为药物和辐射暴露的顺序和时间提供了理论依据,这可能既有效又可耐受。技术的进步也提供了更安全的输注设备,导致了将IUdR或BUdR与辐射联合的临床试验再次兴起。目前的实验室研究正在提供关于肿瘤细胞动力学的数据,这些数据正被应用于正在进行的临床试验。氟嘧啶,主要是5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU),也用于早期临床试验,并且与IUdR/BUdR不同,被发现作为单一药物对多种肿瘤类型具有显著活性。5-FU与放疗的临床整合进展较慢,但最近的试验已证明有治疗获益。目前已在直肠癌、食管癌和肛管癌患者中证明,5-FU与放疗联合使用相对于单纯放疗可提高局部控制率和生存率。然而,氟嘧啶与放疗之间的相互作用机制仍不确定,并且仍在进行研究,以期改善临床结果。随着受卤代嘧啶影响细胞途径的确定,这些药物的生化调节潜力已得到认可。亚叶酸,最常用的调节剂,已被证明可增强转移性结直肠癌患者中5-FU的活性。这些研究为目前使用IUdR、BUdR和5-FU的生化调节剂作为放射增敏剂的试验提供了一个范例。羟基脲,目前用于治疗慢性白血病,也被认为是一种放射增敏剂。与IUdR/BUdR一样,临床试验往往没有定论,对这种放射增敏剂的兴趣已经减弱。对作用机制以及肿瘤细胞/正常组织动力学的了解不足可能是该策略总体上未成功的原因。目前对人类细胞动力学和羟基脲作用潜在机制的研究可能会为未来羟基脲放射增敏试验提供关键信息。