Chapman R W
Shasta-Cascade Family Practice Residency, University of California-Davis, Redding.
Fam Med. 1993 Nov-Dec;25(10):650-2.
There is a significant lack of information regarding the evaluation of family practice residents.
A questionnaire was sent to all 397 family practice residency directors in the United States to determine the methods used in evaluating family practice residents.
Seventy-nine percent of residency directors returned the survey. Family practice faculty are involved in the majority of resident evaluations and are trained in the evaluation process in 46% of the programs. The most common evaluation method was a written form completed in 99% of the programs for inpatient evaluations and in 67% for outpatient evaluations. The evaluation forms were five years or older in 30% of the programs and were rotation specific in 40% of the programs. Other evaluation methods included videotaping, peer and self-evaluations, and structured clinical examinations.
Faculty development in evaluation performance is strongly encouraged. Written evaluation forms are used extensively, but the quality of these forms remains unknown. Further investigations into appropriate family practice evaluation methods are recommended.
关于家庭医学住院医师评估的信息严重匮乏。
向美国所有397名家庭医学住院医师培训项目主任发送了一份调查问卷，以确定评估家庭医学住院医师所采用的方法。
79%的住院医师培训项目主任回复了调查。家庭医学教员参与了大多数住院医师评估，并且在46%的项目中接受过评估过程方面的培训。最常见的评估方法是书面形式，99%的项目用于住院患者评估，67%用于门诊患者评估。30%的项目中评估表使用了五年或更久，40%的项目中评估表是针对特定轮转的。其他评估方法包括录像、同行和自我评估以及结构化临床考试。
强烈鼓励在评估绩效方面开展教员培训。书面评估表被广泛使用，但其质量仍不清楚。建议对适当的家庭医学评估方法进行进一步调查。
Zotero 插件