Schiff D, DeAngelis L M
Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Cancer. 1994 Jan 15;73(2):493-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940115)73:2<493::aid-cncr2820730240>3.0.co;2-d.
Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are common in patients with brain metastases. Few data exist to help guide the clinician's choice between the two therapeutic options of anticoagulation and inferior vena cava filter placement.
The authors reviewed their institutions' experience with the treatment of venous thromboembolism in 51 adult patients with known brain metastases since 1980.
Ten patients were initially treated with Greenfield filters; four (40%) had recurrent nonfatal thromboembolic events (two PE and two DVT), and three required anticoagulation. Thirty-nine patients were treated initially with anticoagulation; none of these patients later received filters. Two patients with DVT were untreated and both died of PE. Among 42 patients who received anticoagulation, the duration of anticoagulation ranged from 5 to 563 days (mean, 100 days). Two patients who received anticoagulation experienced devastating central nervous system hemorrhage in the setting of supratherapeutic anticoagulation by conventional laboratory criteria. A third patient experienced a minor deterioration, possibly attributable to hemorrhage, for a 7% (3 of 42) incidence of serious central nervous system complications. Three asymptomatic patients developed hyperdensity within metastases on routine follow-up noncontrast computed tomography scan, suggesting possible intratumoral hemorrhage. Three patients taking warfarin had recurrent DVT with prothrombin time between 15.1 and 17.7. Systemic bleeding complications were generally minor and occurred in only eight patients (19%).
Anticoagulation is more effective than Greenfield filters and acceptably safe when maintained in the therapeutic range in most patients with brain metastases and venous thromboembolism.
深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE)在脑转移患者中很常见。几乎没有数据可帮助指导临床医生在抗凝和下腔静脉滤器置入这两种治疗选择之间做出抉择。
作者回顾了自1980年以来其机构对51例已知脑转移的成年患者进行静脉血栓栓塞治疗的经验。
10例患者最初接受了格林菲尔德滤器治疗;4例(40%)发生复发性非致命性血栓栓塞事件(2例PE和2例DVT),3例需要抗凝治疗。39例患者最初接受抗凝治疗;这些患者后来均未接受滤器治疗。2例DVT患者未接受治疗,均死于PE。在42例接受抗凝治疗的患者中,抗凝持续时间为5至563天(平均100天)。2例接受抗凝治疗的患者在常规实验室标准显示抗凝治疗超标的情况下发生了毁灭性的中枢神经系统出血。第3例患者病情轻微恶化,可能归因于出血,严重中枢神经系统并发症的发生率为7%(42例中的3例)。3例无症状患者在常规随访非增强计算机断层扫描中发现转移瘤内密度增高,提示可能发生瘤内出血。3例服用华法林的患者发生复发性DVT,凝血酶原时间在15.1至17.7之间。全身出血并发症一般较轻,仅8例患者(19%)发生。
对于大多数脑转移和静脉血栓栓塞患者,抗凝治疗比格林菲尔德滤器更有效,且在治疗范围内维持时安全性可接受。