Suppr超能文献

所有房颤患者在进行电复律前都应该接受经食管超声心动图检查吗?

Should all patients undergo transesophageal echocardiography before electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation?

作者信息

Grimm R A, Stewart W J, Black I W, Thomas J D, Klein A L

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44195-5064.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Feb;23(2):533-41. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90443-x.

Abstract

The management of anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing electrical cardioversion remains controversial, largely because of inadequate studies demonstrating risk or benefit, a relatively inconvenient anticoagulation management strategy and the increasing use of transesophageal echocardiography. Recent investigations into the potential mechanisms involved in the development of thrombus and systemic embolism in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation may provide insight into underlying predisposing factors, with subsequent modification of management strategies. Conventional wisdom suggests that preexisting thrombus is responsible for thromboembolic events after cardioversion. However, development of a thrombogenic milieu after cardioversion, particularly in the left atrial appendage, may also be an important predisposing factor. To protect against both potential mechanisms of embolization, these data support therapeutic anticoagulation for all patients with atrial fibrillation of > 2 days in duration from the time of, as well as after cardioversion for a total of 4 weeks, undergoing cardioversion, even in the absence of thrombus on echocardiography. Therefore, the role of transesophageal echocardiography in this setting should be to enable early cardioversion if atrial thrombus is excluded and to identify high risk patients with atrial thrombi so as to postpone cardioversion and avoid the risk of embolization. Ultimately, however, a controlled, randomized and prospective clinical trial will be required to compare conventional management with a transesophageal echocardiography-guided strategy.

摘要

房颤患者接受心脏电复律时抗凝治疗的管理仍存在争议,主要原因是缺乏足够的研究来证明其风险或益处、抗凝管理策略相对不便以及经食管超声心动图的使用日益增加。最近对房颤患者心脏电复律过程中血栓形成和全身栓塞潜在机制的研究,可能有助于深入了解潜在的易感因素,从而改进管理策略。传统观点认为,复律后血栓栓塞事件是由先前存在的血栓引起的。然而,复律后特别是左心耳形成血栓形成环境,也可能是一个重要的易感因素。为防范这两种潜在的栓塞机制,这些数据支持对所有房颤持续时间超过2天的患者,在复律时及复律后总共4周进行抗凝治疗,即使超声心动图未发现血栓。因此,在这种情况下,经食管超声心动图的作用应是在排除心房血栓时实现早期复律,并识别有心房血栓的高危患者,以便推迟复律并避免栓塞风险。然而,最终需要进行一项对照、随机和前瞻性临床试验,以比较传统管理策略与经食管超声心动图引导策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验