Dixon-Mueller R
International Women's Health Coalition, New York, NY 10010.
Stud Fam Plann. 1993 Sep-Oct;24(5):269-82.
Sexuality and power relations based on gender are relevant to researchers, policymakers, and service providers in the reproductive health field, because they underlie virtually all of the behaviors and conditions that their programs address. Yet, a review of conventional treatments in the demographic and family planning literature reveals that, when they consider these topics at all, researchers typically adopt narrow definitions of sexual behavior and focus almost exclusively on risks of pregnancy and disease. This article proposes an analytic framework as a guide to researchers and family planning providers. It relates four dimensions of sexuality to reproductive health outcomes and concludes that family planning policies and programs should address a broader spectrum of sexual behaviors and meanings, consider questions of sexual enjoyment as well as risk, and confront ideologies of male entitlement that threaten women's sexual and reproductive rights and health.
基于性别的性取向和权力关系与生殖健康领域的研究人员、政策制定者及服务提供者密切相关,因为它们几乎构成了其项目所涉及的所有行为和状况的基础。然而,对人口统计学和计划生育文献中的传统治疗方法进行回顾后发现,研究人员在考虑这些主题时,通常采用狭义的性行为定义,并且几乎完全专注于怀孕和疾病风险。本文提出了一个分析框架,作为研究人员和计划生育服务提供者的指南。它将性取向的四个维度与生殖健康结果联系起来,并得出结论:计划生育政策和项目应涵盖更广泛的性行为及意义,既要考虑性愉悦问题,也要考虑风险问题,还要应对威胁女性性权利和生殖权利及健康的男性权利意识形态。