Aoki M, Forbess J M, Jonas R A, Mayer J E, Castaneda A R
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994 Feb;107(2):338-49; discussion 349-50.
The choice of optimal repair for many patients with double-outlet right ventricle continues to challenge the heart surgeon. We present the results of a 10-year surgical experience with the biventricular repair for double-outlet right ventricle with situs solitus and atrioventricular concordance. Preoperative anatomic findings within this population of 73 patients are detailed. These morphologic features are correlated with type of anatomic repair and clinical outcome. Patients were classified by ventricular septal defect location. Normal coronary anatomy was found in the majority of patients with subaortic and doubly-committed ventricular septal defects. Patients with subpulmonary and noncommitted ventricular septal defects had a wide variety of coronary anatomy. Patients with subpulmonary and noncommitted ventricular septal defects also had a considerably higher prevalence of aortic arch obstruction. A tricuspid-to-pulmonary annular distance equal to or greater than the diameter of the aortic annulus was found to indicate the possibility of achieving a conventional ventricular septal defect-to-aorta intraventricular tunnel repair. Tricuspid-to-pulmonary annular distance sufficient for intraventricular tunnel repair predominates in those patients with a right posterior or right side-by-side aorta. Five types of repair were used during the study period: intraventricular tunnel repair, arterial switch with ventricular septal defect-to-pulmonary artery baffle, Rastelli-type extracardiac conduit repair, Damus-Kaye-Stansel repair, and atrial inversion with ventricular septal defect-to-pulmonary artery baffle. Overall actuarial survival estimate at 8 years is 81%. The presence of multiple ventricular septal defects and patient weight lower than the median were nearly significant risk factors for early mortality (p < 0.06). Nineteen patients (26%) required 24 reoperations. Patients with subaortic ventricular septal defects were significantly reoperation free (p < 0.05). Patients with noncommitted ventricular septal defects were at significantly higher risk for reoperation during the study period (p < 0.05). The prevalence of late right or left ventricular outflow obstruction in the nonsubaortic groups is concerning. The median age at repair in this series was 0.76 years, and there was a nonsignificant trend (p = 0.13) for early mortality in patients younger than 1 year of age. These patients tended to have other serious cardiac anomalies associated with double-outlet right ventricle that necessitated early operation. On the basis of these data, we favor early repair for double-outlet right ventricle if possible.
对于许多右心室双出口患者而言,选择最佳修复方式一直是心脏外科医生面临的挑战。我们展示了对73例心脏位置正常、房室一致的右心室双出口患者进行双心室修复的10年手术经验。详细介绍了这一群体患者的术前解剖学发现。这些形态学特征与解剖修复类型及临床结果相关。患者根据室间隔缺损位置进行分类。大多数主动脉下型和双动脉干型室间隔缺损患者的冠状动脉解剖结构正常。肺动脉下型和非动脉干型室间隔缺损患者的冠状动脉解剖结构多种多样。肺动脉下型和非动脉干型室间隔缺损患者主动脉弓梗阻的发生率也显著更高。发现三尖瓣至肺动脉瓣环距离等于或大于主动脉瓣环直径表明有可能实现传统的室间隔缺损至主动脉心室内隧道修复。在主动脉位于右后方或右侧并列的患者中,三尖瓣至肺动脉瓣环距离足以进行心室内隧道修复的情况占主导。研究期间使用了五种修复方式:心室内隧道修复、动脉调转术加室间隔缺损至肺动脉挡板、Rastelli型心外管道修复、Damus-Kaye-Stansel修复以及心房调转术加室间隔缺损至肺动脉挡板。8年的总体精算生存率估计为81%。存在多个室间隔缺损以及患者体重低于中位数几乎是早期死亡的显著危险因素(p < 0.06)。19例患者(26%)需要进行24次再次手术。主动脉下型室间隔缺损患者再次手术率显著较低(p < 0.05)。在研究期间,非动脉干型室间隔缺损患者再次手术风险显著更高(p < 0.05)。非主动脉下型组晚期右心室或左心室流出道梗阻的发生率令人担忧。本系列患者的中位修复年龄为0.76岁,1岁以下患者早期死亡存在不显著的趋势(p = 0.13)。这些患者往往伴有与右心室双出口相关的其他严重心脏异常,需要早期手术。基于这些数据,我们主张尽可能对右心室双出口进行早期修复。