Anaesthesia. 1994 Jan;49(1):3-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb03302.x.
A multicentre study was undertaken to assess the potential value of the laryngeal mask airway when inserted by ward nurses during resuscitation as a method of airway management, prior to the arrival of the Advanced Life Support Team with tracheal intubation capability. The nurses underwent a training programme agreed by all the participating hospitals and followed an identical protocol and data recording system. One hundred and thirty nurses were trained and 164 cases of cardiac arrest were studied. The laryngeal mask airway was inserted at the first attempt in 71% and at the second attempt in 26% of cases. Satisfactory chest expansion occurred in 86% of cases. The mean interval between cardiac arrest and laryngeal mask airway insertion was 2.4 min. Regurgitation of gastric contents occurred before airway insertion in 20 cases (12%), during the insertion in three cases (2%), but there was clinical evidence of pulmonary aspiration in only one patient, who survived to leave hospital. We conclude that the laryngeal mask airway offers advantages over other methods of airway and ventilation management, such as the bag-valve-mask or mouth-to-mouth methods that are currently used by ward nurses in resuscitating patients with cardiac arrest. In this study, the laryngeal mask airway was not being compared with the tracheal tube.
开展了一项多中心研究,旨在评估在具备气管插管能力的高级生命支持团队抵达之前,病房护士在复苏过程中插入喉罩气道作为气道管理方法的潜在价值。护士们参加了所有参与医院共同认可的培训项目,并遵循相同的方案和数据记录系统。130名护士接受了培训,共研究了164例心脏骤停病例。71%的病例首次尝试即成功插入喉罩气道,26%的病例第二次尝试成功插入。86%的病例出现了满意的胸廓扩张。心脏骤停与插入喉罩气道之间的平均间隔时间为2.4分钟。20例(12%)在气道插入前出现胃内容物反流,3例(2%)在插入过程中出现胃内容物反流,但仅有1例患者有肺部误吸的临床证据,该患者存活出院。我们得出结论,与其他气道和通气管理方法相比,如病房护士目前在心脏骤停患者复苏中使用的袋阀面罩或口对口方法,喉罩气道具有优势。在本研究中,未将喉罩气道与气管导管进行比较。