Kassebaum D G, Szenas P L
Division of Educational Research and Assessment, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC.
Acad Med. 1994 Feb;69(2):163-70. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199402000-00027.
The authors describe how the 8,128 medical school seniors who completed the 1993 AAMC Medical School Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) rated the influence that each of 36 factors (such as interest in helping people) had on their specialty decisions, using a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale where 4 indicated a major influence on specialty choice. The list of factors and their mean ratings are presented to show those of greatest influence (e.g., type of patient problems encountered, rated 3.44), of moderate influence (e.g., type of patients encountered; 2.75), and of limited influence (e.g., length of residency; 1.18). Factors' ratings also are compared across specialty groups. While the seven most influential factors were given about the same weight by the seniors regardless of their specialty choice, there were significant differences in the ratings of other factors across specialties (e.g., patient contact factors were rated higher by future generalists than by graduates favoring other specialties). The GQ respondents' ratings of factors over time are compared for 1991, 1992, and 1993. Last, those respondents who had changed their minds about a specialty were asked to rate the 36 factors according to how strongly they had influenced the rejection of the previous specialty choice; most of the factors were rated as having been of minor influence. As a general rule, income prospects and educational debt were not strong influences, either on specialty choice or rejection. The authors state that the influences of the factors they have reported are those that set the initial direction of graduates' residency training.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
作者描述了8128名完成1993年美国医学院协会医学院毕业调查问卷(GQ)的大四学生,如何使用0至4的李克特量表来评估36个因素(如帮助他人的兴趣)中的每一个因素对其专业选择的影响,其中4表示对专业选择有重大影响。列出了这些因素及其平均评分,以显示影响最大的因素(如遇到的患者问题类型,评分为3.44)、影响中等的因素(如遇到的患者类型;2.75)和影响有限的因素(如住院医师培训时长;1.18)。还比较了各专业组因素的评分。尽管无论专业选择如何,这七个最具影响力的因素被大四学生赋予的权重大致相同,但不同专业对其他因素的评分存在显著差异(如未来全科医生对患者接触因素的评分高于倾向于其他专业的毕业生)。比较了1991年、1992年和1993年GQ受访者对各因素的评分随时间的变化。最后,那些改变了专业想法的受访者被要求根据这些因素对他们放弃之前专业选择的影响程度对这36个因素进行评分;大多数因素被评为影响较小。一般来说,收入前景和教育债务对专业选择或放弃的影响都不大。作者指出,他们报告的这些因素的影响是那些为毕业生住院医师培训设定初始方向的影响。(摘要截选至250字)