Kobayashi S, Terayama K
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1993;112(3):109-12. doi: 10.1007/BF00449983.
A portable stress-applying device for stress radiography was developed for daily clinical use. Using this device, stress radiography for the diagnosis of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency was performed with the knee flexed at 20 degrees and at 90 degrees. A 100-N force was chosen as a standardized stress. The subjects were classified into four groups: the manually tested ACL-deficient group (32 knees), the manually tested control group (80 knees), the instrumentally tested ACL-deficient group (14 knees), and the instrumentally tested control group (34 knees). There was no statistical difference in the reliability (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy) of stress radiography between the manual technique and the instrumental technique. When stress radiography with the knee flexed at 20 degrees and that at 90 degrees were compared, the former was more reliable than the latter. As the manual technique is compromised by a lack of standardization in applied force, a mechanical device is required in quantitative stress radiography. The reliability of stress radiography with the knee flexed at 20 degrees is considered high enough to warrant dispensing with further stress radiography with the knee flexed at 90 degrees for diagnosing ACL deficiency.
我们开发了一种用于应力放射成像的便携式应力施加装置,以供日常临床使用。使用该装置,在膝关节屈曲20度和90度时进行应力放射成像,以诊断前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤。选择100 N的力作为标准化应力。受试者分为四组:手动测试的ACL损伤组(32个膝关节)、手动测试的对照组(80个膝关节)、仪器测试的ACL损伤组(14个膝关节)和仪器测试的对照组(34个膝关节)。手动技术和仪器技术在应力放射成像的可靠性(敏感性、特异性和准确性)方面没有统计学差异。当比较膝关节屈曲20度和90度时的应力放射成像时,前者比后者更可靠。由于手动技术因施加力缺乏标准化而受到影响,因此在定量应力放射成像中需要一种机械设备。膝关节屈曲20度时应力放射成像的可靠性被认为足够高,足以保证在诊断ACL损伤时无需进一步进行膝关节屈曲90度的应力放射成像。