Tahan M, Boulet L P
Unité de Recherche, Hôpital Laval, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Chest. 1993 Jul;104(1):143-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.104.1.143.
This study looked at the effects of posture on the morning/evening expiratory flows and airway responsiveness to methacholine. Fourteen nonsmoking subjects with stable asthma (eight men, six women) were included in the study. Subjects were randomly allocated to spend 4 h in the supine or seated position on separate days, in the morning from 8 to 12 AM and in the evening from 8 to 12 PM. The FEV1 was measured hourly in the assigned position. Before and after each 4-h period, a methacholine inhalation test was done in the sitting position. In the morning study, baseline FEV1 measurements on the supine and seated days were not different. There was no significant difference between the baseline and postsession FEV1 on both days (baseline and postsession FEV1 percent predicted +/- SEM; seated: 83.6 +/- 2.9, 83.8 +/- 3.3; supine: 85.8 +/- 2.8, 85.4 +/- 3.7; n = 13). delta FEV1 (baseline/postsession) was not different between the two sessions. In the evening study, baseline FEV1 measurements on the supine and seated days were similar. FEV1 decreased after both sessions, although this difference reached statistical significance only in the supine position (baseline and postsession FEV1 percent predicted +/- SEM; seated: 90.0 +/- 4.1, 84.9 +/- 4.1, p = 0.08; supine: 90.7 +/- 3.1, 82.9 +/- 4.5, p = 0.02; n = 8). delta FEV1 (baseline/postsession) was not different between the two evening sessions. In the morning, after the seated position, PC20 methacholine was unchanged (mean PC20 [mg/ml]: beginning = 1.00, end = 1.02) while after the supine position it was slightly reduced from a mean of 0.97 to 0.73 mg/ml. This last reduction was mainly observed in the most hyperresponsive subjects and its magnitude was significantly correlated with baseline PC20 (r = 0.637, p = 0.024). The increase in methacholine response (delta PC20) after the supine session was significantly higher than after the seated session. In the evening study, there was a slight reduction in PC20 after both sessions, but this was only significant after the supine position (mean PC20 baseline and postsession [mg/ml]: seated: 0.63, 0.47, p = 0.08; supine: 0.62, 0.44, p = 0.04). No difference was found between delta PC20 of the two sessions. We conclude that the supine position does not have persistent effects on FEV1, but it may increase airway responsiveness in the most hyperreactive subjects.
本研究观察了姿势对早晚呼气流量以及气道对乙酰甲胆碱反应性的影响。14名患有稳定型哮喘的非吸烟受试者(8名男性,6名女性)被纳入研究。受试者被随机分配在不同日期的上午8点至12点和晚上8点至12点,分别在仰卧位或坐位停留4小时。在指定体位每小时测量一次第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)。在每个4小时时间段前后,在坐位进行乙酰甲胆碱吸入试验。在上午的研究中,仰卧位和坐位当天的基线FEV1测量值无差异。两天的基线和试验后FEV1之间均无显著差异(基线和试验后FEV1预测百分比±标准误;坐位:83.6±2.9,83.8±3.3;仰卧位:85.8±2.8,85.4±3.7;n = 13)。两个时间段之间的FEV1变化量(基线/试验后)无差异。在晚上的研究中,仰卧位和坐位当天的基线FEV1测量值相似。两个时间段后FEV1均下降,尽管这种差异仅在仰卧位达到统计学显著性(基线和试验后FEV1预测百分比±标准误;坐位:90.0±4.1,84.9±4.1,p = 0.08;仰卧位:90.7±3.1,82.9±4.5,p = 0.02;n = 8)。两个晚上时间段之间的FEV1变化量(基线/试验后)无差异。在上午,坐位后,乙酰甲胆碱激发试验的PC20不变(平均PC20[mg/ml]:开始 = 1.00,结束 = 1.02),而仰卧位后从平均0.97mg/ml略微降至0.73mg/ml。最后这种降低主要在反应性最高的受试者中观察到,其幅度与基线PC20显著相关(r = 0.637,p = 0.024)。仰卧位时间段后乙酰甲胆碱反应性的增加(PC20变化量)显著高于坐位时间段后。在晚上的研究中,两个时间段后PC20均略有降低,但仅在仰卧位后有统计学显著性(平均PC20基线和试验后[mg/ml]:坐位:0.63,0.47,p = 0.08;仰卧位:0.62,0.44,p = 0.04)。两个时间段的PC20变化量之间未发现差异。我们得出结论,仰卧位对FEV1没有持续影响,但可能会增加反应性最高的受试者的气道反应性。