Puri R N, Colman R W
Sol Sherry Thrombosis Research Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1993 Jun;4(3):465-78.
The use of first generation plasminogen activators, urokinase, streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator has revolutionized thrombolytic therapy for myocardial infarction and ischaemia, and potentially stroke. However, thrombolytic therapy employing these activators is limited by reocclusion of the very arteries being opened, which follows in a small but significant number of patients. The development of second generation plasminogen activators, e.g. staphylokinase and anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex, has not alleviated the problems encountered with classical plasminogen activators. It is now widely recognized that aberrant platelet aggregation induced primarily by thrombin, rather than plasmin, is one of the major causes of recurrent thrombosis following pharmacologic thrombolysis. Agents that (a) inhibit enzymatic and/or coagulant activity of thrombin, (b) block binding of thrombin to its receptor, and (c) interfere with the generation of thrombin by the prothrombinase complex may compromise haemostasis resulting in haemorrhage. We recently demonstrated that thrombin-induced platelet aggregation is accompanied by cleavage of aggregin, a putative ADP-receptor on the platelet surface, and that these events are indirectly mediated by intracellularly activated calpain expressed on the surface. In this review, we discuss the known mechanisms of thrombin-induced platelet aggregation and suggest relative advantages of potential pharmacological agents, being developed in our laboratory, over those that have been previously developed and tested. These inhibitors selectively prevent aggregation of platelets induced by thrombin by inhibiting calpain expressed on the surface. Moreover, one of these inhibitors which blocks thrombin-induced platelet aggregation does not interfere with other platelet responses mediated by thrombin or platelet aggregation induced by other agonists, such as, ADP, collagen, phorbol myristate acetate and thromboxane A2 mimetics. This selectivity could reduce the chances of perturbing the formation of a haemostatic plug.
第一代纤溶酶原激活剂、尿激酶、链激酶和组织纤溶酶原激活剂的应用彻底改变了心肌梗死、缺血以及潜在的中风的溶栓治疗。然而,使用这些激活剂进行溶栓治疗受到正在开通的动脉再次闭塞的限制,在少数但数量可观的患者中会出现这种情况。第二代纤溶酶原激活剂,如葡萄球菌激酶和茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物的开发,并未缓解经典纤溶酶原激活剂所遇到的问题。现在人们普遍认识到,主要由凝血酶而非纤溶酶诱导的异常血小板聚集是药物溶栓后复发性血栓形成的主要原因之一。(a)抑制凝血酶的酶活性和/或凝血活性、(b)阻断凝血酶与其受体的结合以及(c)干扰凝血酶原酶复合物产生凝血酶的药物可能会破坏止血功能,导致出血。我们最近证明,凝血酶诱导的血小板聚集伴随着聚集素(一种血小板表面假定的ADP受体)的裂解,并且这些事件是由表面表达的细胞内激活的钙蛋白酶间接介导的。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了凝血酶诱导血小板聚集的已知机制,并提出了我们实验室正在开发的潜在药物相对于先前开发和测试的药物的相对优势。这些抑制剂通过抑制表面表达的钙蛋白酶选择性地阻止凝血酶诱导的血小板聚集。此外,这些抑制剂中的一种可阻断凝血酶诱导的血小板聚集,但不干扰由凝血酶介导的其他血小板反应或由其他激动剂(如ADP、胶原、佛波酯肉豆蔻酸酯和血栓素A2模拟物)诱导的血小板聚集。这种选择性可以减少干扰止血栓形成的机会。