Suppr超能文献

长效醋酸亮丙瑞林与达那唑治疗有症状子宫内膜异位症女性的疗效比较:一项多中心、双盲随机临床试验。II. 安全性评估。亮丙瑞林子宫内膜异位症研究组

Depot leuprolide acetate versus danazol in the treatment of women with symptomatic endometriosis: a multicenter, double-blind randomized clinical trial. II. Assessment of safety. The Lupron Endometriosis Study Group.

作者信息

Wheeler J M, Knittle J D, Miller J D

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jul;169(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90126-4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This is the first multicenter, double-blind randomized clinical trial that compares a depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist with danazol in the treatment of endometriosis. Efficacy results have been previously reported; this report focuses on safety data.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 270 patients from 22 centers were randomly selected to receive either leuprolide acetate depot (3.75 mg injected monthly) or danazol (800 mg administered orally daily). Safety outcomes included adverse effects, clinical laboratory changes, and bone mineral density changes.

RESULTS

Most patients receiving either drug reported side effects, most of which were related to the hypoestrogenism of leuprolide (e.g., vasodilatation) and relative hyperandrogenism of danazol (e.g., weight gain). Similarly small numbers of patients dropped out of the two treatment groups because of the side effects encountered. Leuprolide depot caused a greater decrease in bone density; preliminary data suggest a return to baseline on cessation of the drug. Danazol was associated with alteration of serum lipids, specifically a significant decrease in high-density lipoprotein.

CONCLUSIONS

Although side effects were commonly reported in both groups, the drugs were similarly safe in terms of the absence of serious complications and the results of cessation of therapy. Side effects were largely reversible on discontinuation of medication. More longitudinal data are necessary before the possibility of long-term risks can be excluded, especially as they pertain to bone mineral density and lipids.

摘要

目的

这是第一项比较长效促性腺激素释放激素激动剂与达那唑治疗子宫内膜异位症的多中心、双盲随机临床试验。疗效结果此前已报道;本报告重点关注安全性数据。

研究设计

从22个中心共随机选取270例患者,分别接受醋酸亮丙瑞林长效制剂(每月注射3.75毫克)或达那唑(每日口服800毫克)治疗。安全结果包括不良反应、临床实验室指标变化和骨密度变化。

结果

接受任何一种药物治疗的大多数患者都报告了副作用,其中大多数与亮丙瑞林的低雌激素作用(如血管扩张)和达那唑的相对高雄激素作用(如体重增加)有关。同样,两个治疗组中因出现副作用而退出的患者数量较少。亮丙瑞林长效制剂导致骨密度下降幅度更大;初步数据表明停药后骨密度可恢复至基线水平。达那唑与血脂改变有关,尤其是高密度脂蛋白显著降低。

结论

尽管两组均普遍报告有副作用,但在无严重并发症及停药结果方面,两种药物的安全性相似。停药后副作用大多可逆。在排除长期风险可能性之前,尤其是与骨密度和血脂相关的风险,需要更多的纵向数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验