• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房中的跨学科生物伦理协作决策

Collaborative interdisciplinary bioethical decision making in intensive care units.

作者信息

Baggs J G

机构信息

Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester, NY.

出版信息

Nurs Outlook. 1993 May-Jun;41(3):108-12.

PMID:8346049
Abstract

There is strong support in the literature for involvement of nurses with patients and physicians in bioethical decision making about patient care. There are indications that nurses and physicians have different beliefs about decisions made and about the decision-making processes, such as who should be involved and what factors should influence such decisions. The literature also demonstrates that nurses often disagree with physicians or are not involved in ethical decision making or both. Interdisciplinary collaboration has been proposed to improve decision making and recommended for health care giving generally. There is research support for the benefit of collaboration in care giving. Ethical principles also support collaborative decision making, involving nurses, as well as physicians, patients, and family. With collaboration there is sharing of information and perspectives, respect for patient and family autonomy, and disclosure. More studies of interdisciplinary bioethical decision making are needed, measuring both professions' perceptions of their roles in ethical decision making, as well as examining the effects of collaboration on care outcomes.

摘要

文献中有充分的证据支持护士与患者及医生共同参与有关患者护理的生物伦理决策。有迹象表明,护士和医生对所做决策以及决策过程(比如谁应参与其中以及哪些因素应影响此类决策)持有不同的看法。文献还表明,护士常常不同意医生的意见,或者未参与伦理决策,或者两者皆有。有人提议开展跨学科协作以改善决策,并总体上推荐将其用于医疗保健服务。有研究支持协作在护理服务中的益处。伦理原则也支持包括护士、医生、患者及家属在内的协作决策。通过协作,可以共享信息和观点,尊重患者及家属的自主权,并进行信息披露。需要开展更多关于跨学科生物伦理决策的研究,既要衡量两个专业对其在伦理决策中角色的认知,也要考察协作对护理结果的影响。

相似文献

1
Collaborative interdisciplinary bioethical decision making in intensive care units.重症监护病房中的跨学科生物伦理协作决策
Nurs Outlook. 1993 May-Jun;41(3):108-12.
2
A phenomenological study of ethical decision-making experiences among senior intensive care nurses and doctors concerning withdrawal of treatment.一项关于重症监护室资深护士和医生在治疗撤停方面伦理决策体验的现象学研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 1996 Jul-Aug;1(4):182-7.
3
Ethical decision making and the critical care team.伦理决策与重症监护团队。
Crit Care Clin. 1986 Jan;2(1):101-9.
4
The association between interdisciplinary collaboration and patient outcomes in a medical intensive care unit.医学重症监护病房中跨学科协作与患者预后之间的关联。
Heart Lung. 1992 Jan;21(1):18-24.
5
Two instruments to measure interdisciplinary bioethical decision making.两种用于衡量跨学科生物伦理决策的工具。
Heart Lung. 1993 Nov-Dec;22(6):542-7.
6
The dying patient in the ICU: role of the interdisciplinary team.重症监护病房中的临终患者:跨学科团队的作用。
Crit Care Clin. 2004 Jul;20(3):525-40, xi. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2004.03.008.
7
Medical hegemony in decision-making--a barrier to interdisciplinary working in intensive care?决策中的医学霸权——重症监护跨学科合作的障碍?
J Adv Nurs. 2004 May;46(3):245-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.02984.x.
8
Interprofessional collaboration in the ICU: how to define?重症监护病房中的多专业协作:如何定义?
Nurs Crit Care. 2011 Jan-Feb;16(1):5-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2010.00398.x.
9
Intensive care unit use and collaboration between nurses and physicians.
Heart Lung. 1989 Jul;18(4):332-8.
10
Parental role in medical decision-making: fact or fiction? A comparative study of ethical dilemmas in French and American neonatal intensive care units.父母在医疗决策中的角色:事实还是虚构?法国和美国新生儿重症监护病房伦理困境的比较研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 May;58(10):2009-22. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00406-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Decisional responsibility for mechanical ventilation and weaning: an international survey.机械通气和脱机决策责任:一项国际调查。
Crit Care. 2011;15(6):R295. doi: 10.1186/cc10588. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
2
Communication of bed allocation decisions in a critical care unit and accountability for reasonableness.重症监护病房床位分配决策的沟通与合理性问责。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Oct 31;5:67. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-67.
3
The rules of the game: interprofessional collaboration on the intensive care unit team.游戏规则:重症监护病房团队的跨专业协作
Crit Care. 2004 Dec;8(6):R403-8. doi: 10.1186/cc2958. Epub 2004 Oct 8.