Frohlich J, Brun L D, Blank D, Campeau L, Crockford P, Curnew G, Dafoe W, Davignon J, Dufour R, Emery G
Lipid Clinic, University Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Can J Cardiol. 1993 Jun;9(5):405-12.
To compare the safety and efficacy of lovastatin and simvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.
Fourteen Canadian centres participated in this double-blind, randomized, parallel-design study with a six-week screening period, a four-week placebo baseline period and an 18-week active treatment period. Patients were included in the study if their total cholesterol (TC) was at least 6.2 mmol/L and total triglycerides (TG) were 4.0 mmol/L or less at baseline. Half of the patients were in stratum I (TC 6.2 to 7.8 mmol/L at baseline and placebo period) and half in stratum II (TC greater than 7.8 mmol/L). The initial dose of lovastatin or simvastatin (20 and 10 mg/day, respectively) was doubled if the patient's cholesterol was greater than 5.2 mmol/L after six and/or 12 weeks, to a maximum of 80 mg/day lovastatin or 40 mg/day simvastatin. Of 298 randomized patients, two had baseline data only (and were excluded from the efficacy analysis), while 77 were treated with lovastatin and 74 with simvastatin in stratum I, and 72 were on lovastatin and 75 on simvastatin in stratum II.
In stratum I, both lovastatin and simvastatin lowered TC (-26.0% in both the lovastatin and simvastatin groups), low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (-33.4% in lovastatin and -34.4% in simvastatin), TG (-11.4% in lovastatin and -16.2% in simvastatin), apolipoprotein (apo)-B (-24.8% in lovastatin and -26.3% in simvastatin) and the TC:high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol ratio (from 6.65 to 4.73 in lovastatin and from 6.45 to 4.46 in simvastatin), and increased HDL cholesterol (+3.6% in lovastatin and +7.8% in simvastatin) and apo-A1 (+6.3% in lovastatin and +9.0% in simvastatin) with P < 0.001 in all within-group tests except for HDL cholesterol (P < 0.05). Similar results were obtained in stratum II for TC (-30.7% in lovastatin and -30.3% in simvastatin), LDL cholesterol (-37.6% in lovastatin and -36.8% in simvastatin), TG (-21.9% in lovastatin and -16.9% in simvastatin), apo-B (-32.0% in lovastatin and -31.7% in simvastatin), TC:HDL cholesterol ratio (from 8.62 to 5.47 in lovastatin and from 8.96 to 5.77 in simvastatin), HDL cholesterol (+9.7% in lovastatin and +7.5% in simvastatin) and apo-A1 (+7.2% in lovastatin and +8.8% in simvastatin), with P < 0.001 in all within-group tests. Serious adverse events (clinical and laboratory) were reported in four patients in the lovastatin group and three in the simvastatin group. The most reported nonserious adverse effects were gastrointestinal tract (15 patients in the lovastatin group and 16 in the simvastatin group) and musculoskeletal (14 patients in the lovastatin group and 11 in the simvastatin group). Medication was withdrawn in eight patients.
Both lovastatin and simvastatin were found to be effective and well tolerated in each stratum. However, there were no significant differences between lovastatin and simvastatin in the treatment of moderate or severe primary hypercholesterolemia.
比较洛伐他汀和辛伐他汀治疗原发性高胆固醇血症患者的安全性和疗效。
14个加拿大中心参与了这项双盲、随机、平行设计的研究,研究包括为期6周的筛查期、为期4周的安慰剂基线期和为期18周的积极治疗期。如果患者的总胆固醇(TC)在基线时至少为6.2 mmol/L且总甘油三酯(TG)为4.0 mmol/L或更低,则纳入本研究。一半患者处于I层(基线期和安慰剂期TC为6.2至7.8 mmol/L),另一半处于II层(TC大于7.8 mmol/L)。如果患者在6周和/或12周后胆固醇大于5.2 mmol/L,则将洛伐他汀或辛伐他汀的初始剂量(分别为20和10 mg/天)加倍,最大剂量为洛伐他汀80 mg/天或辛伐他汀40 mg/天。在298例随机分组的患者中,2例仅有基线数据(被排除在疗效分析之外),而在I层中,77例接受洛伐他汀治疗,74例接受辛伐他汀治疗;在II层中,72例接受洛伐他汀治疗,75例接受辛伐他汀治疗。
在I层中,洛伐他汀和辛伐他汀均降低了TC(洛伐他汀组和辛伐他汀组均降低26.0%)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇(洛伐他汀组降低33.4%,辛伐他汀组降低34.4%)、TG(洛伐他汀组降低11.4%,辛伐他汀组降低16.2%)、载脂蛋白(apo)-B(洛伐他汀组降低24.8%,辛伐他汀组降低26.3%)以及TC:高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇比值(洛伐他汀组从6.65降至4.73,辛伐他汀组从6.45降至4.46),并升高了HDL胆固醇(洛伐他汀组升高3.6%,辛伐他汀组升高7.8%)和apo-A1(洛伐他汀组升高6.3%,辛伐他汀组升高9.0%),除HDL胆固醇外,所有组内检验的P<0.001(HDL胆固醇P<0.05)。在II层中,TC(洛伐他汀组降低30.7%,辛伐他汀组降低30.3%)、LDL胆固醇(洛伐他汀组降低37.6%,辛伐他汀组降低36.8%)、TG(洛伐他汀组降低21.9%,辛伐他汀组降低16.9%)、apo-B(洛伐他汀组降低32.0%,辛伐他汀组降低31.7%)、TC:HDL胆固醇比值(洛伐他汀组从8.62降至5.47,辛伐他汀组从8.96降至5.77)、HDL胆固醇(洛伐他汀组升高9.7%,辛伐他汀组升高7.5%)和apo-A1(洛伐他汀组升高7.2%,辛伐他汀组升高8.8%)也得到了类似结果,所有组内检验的P<0.001。洛伐他汀组有4例患者报告了严重不良事件(临床和实验室),辛伐他汀组有3例。报告最多的非严重不良反应是胃肠道反应(洛伐他汀组15例,辛伐他汀组16例)和肌肉骨骼反应(洛伐他汀组14例,辛伐他汀组11例)。8例患者停药。
洛伐他汀和辛伐他汀在各层均被发现有效且耐受性良好。然而,在治疗中度或重度原发性高胆固醇血症方面,洛伐他汀和辛伐他汀之间没有显著差异。