Bishop J, Nix A B
School of Mathematics, University of Wales College of Cardiff, UK.
Clin Chem. 1993 Aug;39(8):1638-49.
Numerous papers have been written to show which combinations of Shewhart-type quality-control charts are optimal for detecting systematic shifts in the mean response of a process, increases in the random error of a process, and linear drift effects in the mean response across the assay batch. One paper by Westgard et al. (Clin Chem 1977;23:1857-67) especially seems to have attracted the attention of users. Here we derive detailed results that enable the characteristics of the various Shewhart-type control schemes, including the multirule scheme (Clin Chem 1981;27:493-501), to be calculated and show that a fundamental formula proposed by Westgard et al. in the earlier paper is in error, although their derived results are not seriously wrong. We also show that, from a practical point of view, a suitably chosen Cusum scheme is near optimal for all the types and combinations of errors discussed, thereby removing the selection problem for the user.
已经有大量论文探讨了哪种休哈特型质量控制图组合最适合检测过程平均响应中的系统偏移、过程随机误差的增加以及整个分析批次中平均响应的线性漂移效应。韦斯特加德等人(《临床化学》1977年;23卷:1857 - 1867页)发表的一篇论文似乎特别引起了用户的关注。在此,我们得出了详细结果,能够计算各种休哈特型控制方案的特性,包括多规则方案(《临床化学》1981年;27卷:493 - 501页),并表明韦斯特加德等人在早期论文中提出的一个基本公式是错误的,尽管他们得出结果并非严重错误。我们还表明,从实际角度来看,对于所讨论的所有误差类型和组合,适当选择的累积和方案近乎最优,从而为用户消除了选择问题。