Lindholm B, Park M S, Bergström J
Department of Renal Medicine, Huddinge University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Contrib Nephrol. 1993;103:168-82. doi: 10.1159/000422285.
Peritoneal dialysis is associated with several metabolic and nutritional abnormalities, some of which are related to the use of glucose-based solutions. Furthermore, the catabolic effects of uremia per se, protein and amino acid losses into the dialysate, peritonitis and poor appetite contribute to amino acid abnormalities, negative nitrogen balance and a high prevalence of malnutrition in peritoneal dialysis patients. To overcome these problems the use of amino acid instead of glucose as an osmotic agent has been proposed. Short-term studies have shown that amino acid-based solutions in peritoneal dialysis may supplement in excess the daily losses of amino acids during dialysis with glucose-based solutions. The amino acid solutions produce similar ultrafiltration and solute transport as the standard glucose solutions although the period of effective ultrafiltration is rather short. However, it should be noted that some studies have reported that the transport of small and large solutes may increase in patients using amino acid solutions. During the early 1980s several investigators have developed and tested different amino acid solutions for peritoneal dialysis. The initial clinical experience from Toronto with amino acid solutions containing large amounts of non-essential amino acids and inadequate amount of buffer were in general discouraging. The patients, who were not always malnourished and tended to have a low energy intake, developed increased BUN levels, acidosis, no improvement in nutritional status or amino acid abnormalities and, in some cases, anorexia. In 1985 a new 1% amino acid solution, containing an increased buffer amount and amino acids (mainly essential) in proportions which take the amino acid abnormalities in uremic patients into account, became available. The use of this solution resulted in some improvement in amino acid pattern and nutritional parameters, but acidosis and increased BUN levels remained problems. The experiences from these and previous studies showed that: (1) the improvement of the composition of amino acid solutions was beneficial; (2) a further increase of the buffer amount was needed; (3) patients included should have signs of protein malnutrition combined with low dietary protein intake to benefit from intraperitoneal amino acid supply, and (4) energy intake should be sufficient to prevent amino acids to end up as energy source. For this purpose a new improved 1.1% amino acid solution has been developed containing a further increase of some essential amino acids and an increased amount of lactate (40 mmol/l). This solution has been tested in malnourished patients eating 0.8 g protein/kg/day and 25-30 kcal/kg/day.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
腹膜透析与多种代谢和营养异常有关,其中一些与使用基于葡萄糖的溶液有关。此外,尿毒症本身的分解代谢作用、蛋白质和氨基酸向透析液中的丢失、腹膜炎和食欲不振导致了氨基酸异常、负氮平衡以及腹膜透析患者中营养不良的高患病率。为克服这些问题,有人提出使用氨基酸而非葡萄糖作为渗透剂。短期研究表明,腹膜透析中基于氨基酸的溶液可能会过度补充透析期间使用基于葡萄糖的溶液时氨基酸的每日丢失量。氨基酸溶液产生的超滤和溶质转运与标准葡萄糖溶液相似,尽管有效超滤期相当短。然而,应该注意的是,一些研究报告称,使用氨基酸溶液的患者中小分子和大分子溶质的转运可能会增加。在20世纪80年代早期,几位研究人员开发并测试了用于腹膜透析的不同氨基酸溶液。多伦多使用含有大量非必需氨基酸和缓冲剂不足的氨基酸溶液的初步临床经验总体上令人沮丧。这些患者并不总是营养不良,能量摄入往往较低,他们的血尿素氮水平升高、出现酸中毒、营养状况或氨基酸异常没有改善,在某些情况下还出现了厌食。1985年,一种新的1%氨基酸溶液问世,其缓冲剂含量增加,氨基酸(主要是必需氨基酸)的比例考虑到了尿毒症患者的氨基酸异常情况。使用这种溶液使氨基酸模式和营养参数有了一些改善,但酸中毒和血尿素氮水平升高仍然是问题。这些研究和先前研究的经验表明:(1)改善氨基酸溶液的成分是有益的;(2)需要进一步增加缓冲剂的量;(3)纳入的患者应具有蛋白质营养不良的体征且膳食蛋白质摄入量低,才能从腹腔内氨基酸供应中获益;(4)能量摄入应充足,以防止氨基酸最终成为能量来源。为此,已开发出一种新的改良1.1%氨基酸溶液,其中一些必需氨基酸进一步增加,乳酸含量增加(40 mmol/l)。该溶液已在每日摄入0.8 g蛋白质/千克体重和25 - 30千卡/千克体重的营养不良患者中进行了测试。(摘要截取自400字)