Levitt C J
Midwest Children's Resource Center, Children's Hospital, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Prim Care. 1993 Jun;20(2):343-54.
Clearly, there are numerous troubling variations in the medical diagnosis of child sexual abuse. These variations include delays in disclosure; rapid healing; maturational changes; variations in normal congenital findings; the technique of the examiner; patient position, relaxation, and cooperation; and additional medical conditions that mimic abuse. For these reasons, physical evidence is often inconclusive and can be an unreliable source of information in child sexual abuse cases. The reader is logically cautioned against attempts to diagnose child sexual abuse based on a single finding, particularly that of the diameter of the hymenal orifice. Emphasis on the child's history in documenting the abuse is increasing. As physicians, we must develop interviewing techniques that will assist in child protection, and we must listen and believe the comments made by our patients.
显然,儿童性虐待的医学诊断存在诸多令人困扰的差异。这些差异包括披露延迟;快速愈合;发育变化;正常先天性体征的差异;检查者的技术;患者的体位、放松程度和配合情况;以及模拟虐待的其他医疗状况。由于这些原因,身体证据往往不具有决定性,在儿童性虐待案件中可能是不可靠的信息来源。从逻辑上讲,读者应警惕仅基于单一发现,尤其是处女膜孔直径来诊断儿童性虐待的尝试。在记录虐待情况时,对儿童病史的重视程度日益增加。作为医生,我们必须开发有助于儿童保护的访谈技巧,并且必须倾听并相信患者的陈述。