Hindman B J, Dexter F, Cutkomp J, Smith T, Tinker J H
Department of Anesthesia, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.
Anesthesiology. 1993 Sep;79(3):580-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199309000-00023.
It has been contended that, during cardiopulmonary bypass at 27 degrees C, pH-stat management decreases cerebral metabolic rate for oxygen (CMRO2) more than alpha-stat management. In contrast, other studies have not found CMRO2 to differ between techniques. Using each animal as its own control, the authors assessed the effect of alpha-stat versus pH-stat management of CMRO2, cerebral blood flow (CBF), and brain oxygen extraction during cardiopulmonary bypass at 27 degrees C.
Fourteen New Zealand White rabbits, anesthetized with fentanyl and diazepam, underwent cardiopulmonary bypass at 27 degrees C (membrane oxygenator, centrifugal pump, and bifemoral arterial perfusion). Group 1 animals (n = 7) had alpha-stat management for the initial 65-70 min of bypass, and were then changed to pH-stat management for the remaining 30 min of bypass. Group 2 animals (n = 7) had pH-stat management for the initial 65-70 min of bypass, and were then changed to alpha-stat management for the remaining 30 min. Measurement of CBF (radiolabeled microspheres), CMRO2 (CBF x brain arterial-venous oxygen content difference), brain temperature, systemic hemodynamics, and arterial blood gases were made in each animal under both alpha-stat and pH-stat conditions.
CMRO2 did not differ between alpha-stat and pH-stat conditions (1.4 +/- 0.3 ml.100 g-1.min-1; median +/- quartile deviation), and was independent of order of determination. Changes in CBF between alpha-stat and pH-stat conditions were associated with proportional opposite changes in cerebral oxygen extraction. Cerebral blood flow was significantly greater with pH-stat management than with alpha-stat management (37 +/- 5 vs. 30 +/- 3 ml.100 g-1.min-1, respectively). The CBF response to changing PaCO2 was significantly greater when going from alpha-stat to pH-stat conditions (group 1) than in the reverse order (group 2).
During cardiopulmonary bypass at 27 degrees C, hypothermic acid-base management has no measurable effect on CMRO2. CMRO2 was neither extraction limited nor dependent on either PaCO2, CBF, or hemoglobin oxygen affinity differences between alpha-stat and pH-stat management. Cerebral blood flow responses to changing CMRO2 depend on the "starting" conditions, with alpha-stat management appearing to better preserve CBF reactivity than pH-stat management.
有人认为,在27℃体外循环期间,pH稳态管理比α稳态管理更能降低脑氧代谢率(CMRO2)。然而,其他研究并未发现两种技术下的CMRO2存在差异。作者以每只动物自身作为对照,评估了在27℃体外循环期间,α稳态与pH稳态管理对CMRO2、脑血流量(CBF)及脑氧摄取的影响。
14只新西兰白兔,用芬太尼和地西泮麻醉后,在27℃下行体外循环(膜式氧合器、离心泵及双侧股动脉灌注)。第1组动物(n = 7)在体外循环开始的65 - 70分钟采用α稳态管理,随后在剩余的30分钟改为pH稳态管理。第2组动物(n = 7)在体外循环开始的65 - 70分钟采用pH稳态管理,随后在剩余的30分钟改为α稳态管理。在α稳态和pH稳态条件下,对每只动物测量CBF(放射性微球法)、CMRO2(CBF×脑动静脉氧含量差)、脑温、全身血流动力学及动脉血气。
α稳态和pH稳态条件下的CMRO2无差异(1.4±0.3 ml·100g-1·min-1;中位数±四分位数偏差),且与测定顺序无关。α稳态和pH稳态条件下CBF的变化与脑氧摄取的相反变化成比例相关。pH稳态管理时的脑血流量显著高于α稳态管理(分别为37±5与30±3 ml·100g-1·min-1)。从α稳态转为pH稳态条件时(第1组),CBF对PaCO2变化的反应显著大于相反顺序时(第2组)。
在27℃体外循环期间,低温酸碱管理对CMRO2无显著影响。CMRO2既不受氧摄取限制,也不依赖于α稳态和pH稳态管理之间的PaCO2、CBF或血红蛋白氧亲和力差异。脑血流量对CMRO2变化的反应取决于“起始”条件,α稳态管理似乎比pH稳态管理更能保留CBF反应性。