Wiktorin C, Karlqvist L, Winkel J
Karolinska Hospital and Institute, Department of Occupational Health, Stockholm, Sweden.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1993 Jun;19(3):208-14. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1481.
Exposure data from self-administered questionnaires on manual materials handling and work postures were validated in relation to direct measurements and systematic observations on 39 men and 58 women representing 45 different occupations. The agreement was tested at a dichotomous level and, when possible, with quantification of duration or frequency. At the dichotomous level the agreement was "acceptable" for nine variables concerning work postures and the handling of loads weighing > 5 kg. No variable showed "acceptable" agreement when the duration or the frequency was quantified in more detail (4- to 6-point scales). Musculoskeletal complaints seemed to introduce a differential bias for some lifting variables. Thus some variables for postures or the handling loads of > 5 kg may, under certain conditions, be acceptable for use in epidemiologic studies when the relative risks are high. However, self-reported exposure seems to be too crude if more-detailed information is required.
通过自我管理的问卷收集的关于手工材料搬运和工作姿势的暴露数据,与对代表45种不同职业的39名男性和58名女性进行的直接测量和系统观察结果进行了验证。在二分层面上对一致性进行了测试,并在可能的情况下,对持续时间或频率进行了量化。在二分层面上,对于九个有关工作姿势和搬运重量>5千克负荷的变量,一致性为“可接受”。当更详细地量化持续时间或频率(4至6分制)时,没有变量显示出“可接受”的一致性。肌肉骨骼疾病似乎会给一些举重变量带来差异偏差。因此,在某些条件下,当相对风险较高时,一些姿势变量或搬运重量>5千克负荷的变量在流行病学研究中可能是可接受的。然而,如果需要更详细的信息,自我报告的暴露情况似乎过于粗略。