Mumford J, Weinstein J N, Spratt K F, Goel V K
Spine Diagnostic and Treatment Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Jun 15;18(8):955-70.
There continues to be considerable controversy regarding the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Most feel that failure of the middle osteoligamentous complex, particularly with retropulsion of fragments into the spinal canal, is an indication for operative management. Others advocate postural reduction and prolonged bedrest for such injuries. The purpose of this study was to 1) review the clinical outcome and efficacy of closed management of thoracolumbar burst fractures; and 2) quantify what, if any, remodeling occurs in the bony canal as measured by serial CT. Forty-one patients who presented with a burst fracture of the thoracolumbar spine without neurologic deficit were reviewed clinically and radiographically following nonoperative management. At injury, canal compromise averaged 37% (range, 16-66%); 26 patients had at least 30% canal compromise. During treatment, one patient developed neurologic deterioration that prompted surgery; all other patients remained neurologically intact. At average follow-up of 2 years, an overall outcome evaluation indicated that 49% of the patients had excellent outcomes relative to pain and function; 17%, good; 22%, fair; and 12%, poor. Approximately 90% of the patients had a satisfactory work status relative to factors associated with their burst fracture. Serial roentgenograms documented significant progression in body collapse, which averaged 8% (P < 0.0001) from injury to follow-up. On the other hand, serial CTs documented significant improvement from injury to follow-up for canal compromise and midsagittal diameter. Average improvements in canal compromise and midsagittal diameter were 22% (P < 0.0001) and 11% (P < 0.0001), respectively. Only three patients had canal compromise greater than 30%, no patients had canal compromise greater than 40%, and no patients experienced canal area deterioration over time. On average, nearly two-thirds of the fragment occluding the canal resorbed, with most remodeling complete within one year. For patients with burst fractures presenting neurologically intact, we obtained the following findings: 1) nonoperative management yields acceptable results; 2) following nonoperative management, bony deformity (i.e., kyphosis and body collapse) progresses marginally relative to the rate of canal area remodeling; 3) incidence of subsequent neurologic deficits is quite low; and 4) initial radiographic severity of injury or residual deformity following closed management does not correlate with symptoms at follow-up. This pattern of results suggests nonoperative management as the preferred treatment in these circumstances.
关于胸腰椎爆裂骨折的治疗仍存在相当大的争议。大多数人认为,中柱骨韧带复合体的破坏,尤其是骨折碎片向后突入椎管,是手术治疗的指征。另一些人则主张对这类损伤采用体位复位和长期卧床休息。本研究的目的是:1)回顾胸腰椎爆裂骨折闭合治疗的临床结果和疗效;2)通过系列CT量化骨椎管内发生的重塑情况(如有)。对41例无神经功能缺损的胸腰椎爆裂骨折患者进行了非手术治疗后的临床和影像学复查。受伤时,椎管狭窄平均为37%(范围16%-66%);26例患者椎管狭窄至少30%。治疗期间,1例患者出现神经功能恶化并促使进行手术;所有其他患者神经功能保持完好。平均随访2年时,总体结果评估表明,49%的患者在疼痛和功能方面有优秀的结果;17%为良好;22%为中等;12%为差。相对于与爆裂骨折相关的因素,约90%的患者工作状态令人满意。系列X线片显示椎体塌陷有显著进展,从受伤到随访平均为8%(P<0.0001)。另一方面,系列CT显示从受伤到随访,椎管狭窄和矢状径有显著改善。椎管狭窄和矢状径的平均改善分别为22%(P<0.0001)和11%(P<0.0001)。只有3例患者椎管狭窄大于30%,没有患者椎管狭窄大于40%,也没有患者椎管面积随时间恶化。平均而言,几乎三分之二阻塞椎管的骨折碎片被吸收,大多数重塑在一年内完成。对于神经功能完好的爆裂骨折患者,我们得到以下结果:1)非手术治疗产生可接受的结果;2)非手术治疗后,相对于椎管面积重塑率,骨畸形(即后凸和椎体塌陷)进展轻微;3)后续神经功能缺损的发生率相当低;4)闭合治疗后初始损伤的影像学严重程度或残留畸形与随访时的症状无关。这种结果模式表明在这些情况下非手术治疗是首选的治疗方法。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993-6-15
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2000-8
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010-1
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006-8-15
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988-8
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2001
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009-1-1
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025-4-3
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2025-3
J Spine Surg. 2024-9-23
Tunis Med. 2023-5-5