Lee J G, Leung J W
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 1993 Mar-Apr;56(2):207-14.
Endoscopic sphincterotomy and common duct stone extraction is successful in 85-90% of patients using conventional balloons and baskets. However, most patients with biliary stones > 2 cm will require mechanical, electrohydraulic, or laser lithotripsy prior to stone extraction. Mechanical lithotripsy is inexpensive, easy to perform, and effective in 80-90% of cases. Most failures result from inability to entrap the stone in the lithotripsy basket. These cases may be successfully treated using either electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy (intraductal shockwave lithotripsy). In most cases, intraductal shockwave lithotripsy requires direct visual control. Due to difficulty with peroral cholangioscopy, these techniques will not be widely used until a smaller, more maneuverable "mother and baby scope" system is developed. We recommend mechanical lithotripsy as the initial treatment for large biliary stones. Failed cases should be referred to specialized centers for a repeat attempt with intraductal shockwave lithotripsy. With this approach, an experienced endoscopist is successful in removing biliary stones in over 95% of patients. Long term biliary stenting remains a viable option for the high risk patients with large common bile duct stones.
采用传统气囊和网篮,内镜括约肌切开术及胆总管结石取出术在85%至90%的患者中取得成功。然而,大多数胆管结石大于2厘米的患者在结石取出前需要进行机械、电液压或激光碎石术。机械碎石术价格低廉、操作简便,80%至90%的病例有效。大多数失败是由于无法将结石套入碎石篮。这些病例可使用电液压或激光碎石术(导管内冲击波碎石术)成功治疗。在大多数情况下,导管内冲击波碎石术需要直接视觉控制。由于经口胆管镜检查存在困难,在开发出更小、更易操作的“子母镜”系统之前,这些技术不会被广泛应用。我们建议将机械碎石术作为大胆管结石的初始治疗方法。失败的病例应转诊至专科中心,再次尝试导管内冲击波碎石术。采用这种方法,经验丰富的内镜医师在超过95%的患者中成功取出胆管结石。对于患有大胆总管结石的高危患者,长期胆管支架置入仍是一种可行的选择。