Aikens J, Dix T A
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine 92717.
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1993 Sep;305(2):516-25. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1993.1455.
The mechanisms and relative efficiencies of lipid peroxidation initiation by biological O2-derived oxidants were studied using large unilammellar vesicle (LUV) liposomes, structural models for biological membranes, as targets for oxidation. LUVs, when prepared from dilinoleoylphosphatidylcholine (DLPC) containing either 0 or 5 mol% hydroperoxide (LOOH, added either as a linoleic acid or DLPC hydroperoxide), maintained structural integrity, which enabled evaluation of the relative ability of oxidants to initiate lipid peroxidation when generated outside of the bilayer. LUVs were more oxidazable than multilamellar vesicles or lipids dispersed in solution, supporting their appropriateness as biological membrane models. In parallel to previous results using lipid dispersions (J. Aikens and T. A. Dix, 1991, J. Biol. Chem. 266, 15091-15098), both perhydroxyl (HOO.) and peroxyl (ROO.) radicals initiated lipid peroxidation in LUVs. Oxidants that did not initiate included H2O2, organic hydroperoxides, and, most notably, superoxide (O2-). HOO. and ROO. initiated by different mechanisms: HOO. required the presence of the preexisting LOOHs for efficient initiation, indicating the direct reaction of HOO. with LOOH, whereas ROO. initiated by hydrogen atom abstraction at the bisallylic site of unsaturation on the fatty acid side chain of the PCs. Hydroxyl radicals (HO.s) were poor initiators in comparison to ROO.s (and, indirectly, HOO.s), which might be considered surprising as the latter species are chemically weaker oxidants. The decreased activity of HO. was not due to decreased access to the LUVs; rather, this oxidant appears to react to generate less viable lipid peroxidation propagating species. It was also demonstrated that the fluidity of the LUV membrane had little effect on the relative initiating activity of each oxidant. It is argued that HO. may initiate lipid peroxidation only indirectly in vivo (through the generation of carbon-based peroxyl radicals, ROO.s) and that greater effort should be made to understand the roles of HOO. and ROO. at lipid peroxidation initiation.
利用大单层囊泡(LUV)脂质体(生物膜的结构模型)作为氧化靶点,研究了生物来源的氧衍生氧化剂引发脂质过氧化的机制和相对效率。由含有0或5摩尔%氢过氧化物(LOOH,以亚油酸或二油酰磷脂酰胆碱氢过氧化物形式添加)的二亚油酰磷脂酰胆碱(DLPC)制备的LUV保持了结构完整性,这使得能够评估氧化剂在双层膜外产生时引发脂质过氧化的相对能力。LUV比多层囊泡或分散在溶液中的脂质更易氧化,这支持了它们作为生物膜模型的适用性。与先前使用脂质分散体的结果一致(J. Aikens和T. A. Dix,1991,《生物化学杂志》266,15091 - 15098),过羟基(HOO·)和过氧自由基(ROO·)均能引发LUV中的脂质过氧化。不能引发脂质过氧化的氧化剂包括过氧化氢、有机氢过氧化物,最显著的是超氧阴离子(O₂⁻)。HOO·和ROO·引发脂质过氧化的机制不同:HOO·需要预先存在的LOOH才能有效引发,这表明HOO·与LOOH直接反应,而ROO·是通过从磷脂酰胆碱脂肪酸侧链不饱和双键的双烯丙基位点夺取氢原子引发的。与ROO·(以及间接的HOO·)相比,羟基自由基(HO·)是较差的引发剂,考虑到后一种物质在化学上是较弱的氧化剂,这可能会令人惊讶。HO·活性降低并非由于与LUV接触减少;相反,这种氧化剂似乎反应生成的脂质过氧化传播物种活性较低。还证明了LUV膜的流动性对每种氧化剂的相对引发活性影响很小。有人认为HO·在体内可能仅间接引发脂质过氧化(通过产生碳基过氧自由基ROO·),并且应该更加努力地了解HOO·和ROO·在脂质过氧化引发中的作用。