Livingston R B, Crowley J J, Thompson T, Williamson S K, Meyers F J, O'Rourke T, Neefe J R
Puget Sound Oncology Consortium, Seattle, Washington.
Cancer. 1993 Jun 1;71(11):3509-13. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930601)71:11<3509::aid-cncr2820711108>3.0.co;2-#.
Etoposide may be schedule dependent in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and some data suggest a benefit for increased dose intensity in this disease. This study attempted to optimize dose intensity using an outpatient program that included prolonged, oral etoposide administration.
Cisplatin-etoposide (PE) and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV) were alternated at monthly intervals in patients with extensive SCLC. PE was given as cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 intravenously (i.v.) and etoposide 50 mg/m2/day for 14 days by mouth. CAV was administered as cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2/day for 21 days orally, doxorubicin 20 mg/m2/week for three doses, and vincristine 2 mg i.v. on day 1 only. At the end of 4 months, responding patients received an additional course of PE alternating with CAV, and whole-brain irradiation (3000 cGy in 15 fractions) was delivered to clinical complete responders (CR).
Among 61 eligible patients, 4 achieved CR, and 11 had a partial remission, by strict Southwest Oncology Group criteria. An additional 20 patients demonstrated greater than 50% tumor shrinkage on one disease assessment but did not have confirming measurements at all sites 4 weeks later. The overall response rate was 57%, including the latter group. The toxicity was primarily hematologic, with three treatment-related deaths from neutropenic infection (5%). Grade 4 neutropenia (< 500/microliters) occurred in nine patients (15%) and Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (< 25,000/microliters), in three (5%). Analysis of the delivered dose intensity (in milligrams per square meter per week) as a function of that which was planned revealed a mean of 93% for all courses.
Although substitution of prolonged oral etoposide in PE and oral cyclophosphamide in CAV proved to be feasible, these results suggest no advantage over those from other reported series using these alternating regimens in which the agents are pulsed. Experience with alternating PE-CAV for extensive SCLC is reviewed.
依托泊苷对小细胞肺癌(SCLC)的疗效可能具有时间依赖性,一些数据表明增加剂量强度对该疾病有益。本研究试图通过一个包括延长口服依托泊苷给药的门诊方案来优化剂量强度。
广泛期SCLC患者每月交替接受顺铂-依托泊苷(PE)和环磷酰胺、阿霉素及长春新碱(CAV)治疗。PE方案为第1天和第8天静脉注射顺铂50mg/m²,依托泊苷50mg/m²/天口服,共14天。CAV方案为环磷酰胺60mg/m²/天口服,共21天,阿霉素20mg/m²/周,共3剂,长春新碱仅在第1天静脉注射2mg。4个月结束时,缓解的患者接受额外一个疗程的PE与CAV交替治疗,临床完全缓解(CR)的患者接受全脑照射(15次分割,共3000cGy)。
按照严格的西南肿瘤协作组标准,61例符合条件的患者中,4例达到CR,11例部分缓解。另有20例患者在一次疾病评估时肿瘤缩小超过50%,但4周后并非所有部位都有确认测量值。总体缓解率为57%,包括后一组。毒性主要为血液学毒性,3例因中性粒细胞减少感染导致与治疗相关的死亡(5%)。9例患者(15%)发生4级中性粒细胞减少(<500/微升),3例(5%)发生4级血小板减少(<25,000/微升)。将实际给予的剂量强度(毫克每平方米每周)作为计划剂量强度的函数进行分析,所有疗程的平均值为93%。
尽管在PE方案中用延长口服依托泊苷替代以及在CAV方案中用口服环磷酰胺替代被证明是可行的,但这些结果表明与其他报道的使用这些交替脉冲给药方案的系列研究相比并无优势。对广泛期SCLC采用PE-CAV交替方案的经验进行了回顾。