Suppr超能文献

通过H2(15)O和[18F]尿嘧啶正电子发射断层扫描(PET)评估结直肠癌肝转移灶的灌注及氟尿嘧啶的摄取情况。

Perfusion of colorectal liver metastases and uptake of fluorouracil assessed by H2(15)O and [18F]uracil positron emission tomography (PET).

作者信息

Hohenberger P, Strauss L G, Lehner B, Frohmüller S, Dimitrakopoulou A, Schlag P

机构信息

University Hospital Rudolf Virchow, Robert-Rössle Klinik für Onkologie, Free University of Berlin, Berlin-Buch, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A(12):1682-6. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(93)90104-n.

Abstract

Perfusion and fluorouracil (FU) accumulation were assessed using positron emission tomography (PET) with H2(15)O and 18FU in 36 patients with colorectal liver metastases. The tracers were injected intravenously and via the hepatic artery. Standard uptake values (SUV) were calculated using a region of interest (ROI) technique. The perfusion of non-tumorous liver tissue was similar after intravenous (i.v.) and intra-arterial (i.a.) assessment [mean of 2.67 (s = 0.61) and 2.2 (s = 0.45)]. Metastases were found to be hypoperfused compared to normal liver tissue after i.v. examinations [mean 1.73 (s = 0.77)]; i.a. injections revealed greater perfusion in metastases [mean 6.41 (s = 5.47)]. Single metastases showed up to 10 times greater perfusion with the i.a. injection route than with the i.v. one. However, lesions with no change or lower perfusion were also observed. Generally, accumulation of 18FU in metastases after i.v. infusion was less than after i.a.. Correlation of i.v. perfusion and uptake was moderate (r = 0.54, P = 0.0001); i.a. correlation was only slightly better (r = 0.61, P = 0.008). Perfusion as measured by H2(15)O-PET does not generally predict uptake of 18FU in colorectal liver metastases. To measure FU uptake using PET and 18F seems to be the most accurate method. It would allow one to identify individual patients with considerably greater accumulation of 18FU following i.a. administration who should profit from a cross-over to intrahepatic chemotherapy.

摘要

采用正电子发射断层扫描(PET),使用H₂¹⁵O和¹⁸F氟尿嘧啶(FU)对36例结直肠癌肝转移患者的灌注及FU蓄积情况进行评估。示踪剂经静脉和肝动脉注射。使用感兴趣区(ROI)技术计算标准摄取值(SUV)。静脉注射(i.v.)和动脉注射(i.a.)评估后,非肿瘤性肝组织的灌注情况相似[平均值分别为2.67(标准差=0.61)和2.2(标准差=0.45)]。静脉检查后发现转移灶的灌注低于正常肝组织[平均值1.73(标准差=0.77)];动脉注射显示转移灶灌注更高[平均值6.41(标准差=5.47)]。单个转移灶动脉注射途径的灌注比静脉注射途径高10倍。然而,也观察到无变化或灌注较低的病灶。一般来说,静脉输注后转移灶中¹⁸F-FU的蓄积少于动脉注射后。静脉灌注与摄取的相关性中等(r=0.54,P=0.0001);动脉注射的相关性稍好(r=0.61,P=0.008)。通过H₂¹⁵O-PET测量的灌注一般不能预测结直肠癌肝转移灶中¹⁸F-FU的摄取。使用PET和¹⁸F测量FU摄取似乎是最准确的方法。这将使人们能够识别出在动脉给药后¹⁸F-FU蓄积明显更多的个体患者,这些患者应从改用肝内化疗中获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验