Boyes W K, Hetzler B E, Dyer R S
Neurotoxicology Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.
Int J Psychophysiol. 1993 Jan;14(1):27-39. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(93)90081-y.
The effects of acute ethanol treatment on flash and pattern reversal visual evoked potentials (FEPs and PREPs, respectively) were examined in three experiments using Long-Evans rats. The relationships of evoked potential parameters with blood ethanol concentration and body temperature were examined. In Experiment 1, rats were treated i.p. with vehicle or 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 g ethanol/kg body weight, and tested 30 min later. The 2.0 g/kg group had prolonged latencies of PREP peaks, no changes in PREP peak-to-peak amplitudes, and lower body temperatures than saline-treated controls. The peak latency shifts were significantly correlated with both blood ethanol concentration and body temperature, and were of a magnitude to be expected from similar changes in body temperature alone. Experiment 2 measured both PREPs and paired-flash FEPs in rats 30 min after injection of either 0, 0.5 or 2.0 g/kg ethanol. PREP changes were found following treatment with the high dose which were similar to those of Experiment 1. Some FEP peak latencies were prolonged and peak-to-peak amplitudes were reduced by both doses of ethanol, despite the fact that body temperatures were reduced at only the high dose. At 2.0 g/kg ethanol, the FEP changes in latency, but not amplitude, were in accordance with what would be expected from body temperature changes alone. The third study attempted to investigate the role of reduced body temperature in producing the visual evoked potential changes by testing at room temperatures of 22 or 30 degrees C. Contrary to expectations, the rats receiving 2 g/kg ethanol were approx. 1 degree C cooler than controls at both room temperatures. Evoked potential latencies were greater in ethanol-treated rats than controls at both room temperatures. There were no significant effects of ethanol on FEP amplitudes. Overall, the effects of low doses of ethanol were independent of temperature changes, but the effects of higher doses of ethanol (2.0 g/kg) could not be distinguished from those produced by differences in body temperature alone.
在三项实验中,使用Long-Evans大鼠研究了急性乙醇处理对闪光视觉诱发电位(FEP)和图形翻转视觉诱发电位(PREP)的影响。研究了诱发电位参数与血液乙醇浓度和体温的关系。在实验1中,大鼠腹腔注射溶剂或0.5、1.0或2.0 g乙醇/千克体重,并在30分钟后进行测试。2.0 g/千克组的PREP峰潜伏期延长,PREP峰间振幅无变化,体温低于生理盐水处理的对照组。峰潜伏期变化与血液乙醇浓度和体温均显著相关,其幅度仅由体温的类似变化即可预期。实验2在注射0、0.5或2.0 g/千克乙醇30分钟后测量大鼠的PREP和配对闪光FEP。高剂量处理后发现PREP变化与实验1相似。尽管仅高剂量乙醇会降低体温,但两种剂量的乙醇均会延长一些FEP峰潜伏期并降低峰间振幅。在2.0 g/千克乙醇时,FEP潜伏期变化而非振幅变化与仅由体温变化预期的情况一致。第三项研究试图通过在22或30摄氏度的室温下进行测试来研究体温降低在产生视觉诱发电位变化中的作用。与预期相反,接受2 g/千克乙醇的大鼠在两个室温下均比对照组低约1摄氏度。在两个室温下,乙醇处理的大鼠的诱发电位潜伏期均长于对照组。乙醇对FEP振幅无显著影响。总体而言,低剂量乙醇的影响与温度变化无关,但高剂量乙醇(2.0 g/千克)的影响无法与仅由体温差异产生的影响区分开来。