Wondergem J, Siddik Z H, Strebel F R, Bull J M
Department of Clinical Oncology, University Hospital Leiden, The Netherlands.
Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A(4):549-54. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(05)80149-2.
Thermal enhancement of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) (DDP)-mediated antitumour activity and normal tissue toxicities by whole body hyperthermia were compared in a F344 rat model under different anaesthetic conditions. Whole body hyperthermia (WBH: 120 min at 41.5 degrees C) enhanced both DDP-mediated antitumour activity and toxic side-effects. Our present study shows that anaesthetics might influence the thermal enhancement ratios (TER) calculated for DDP-mediated normal tissue toxicity but did not influence the TER calculated for antitumour activity. The TER calculated for DDP-mediated antitumour activity was 2.9. As a result of the anaesthetics used, the TER calculated for kidney and gastrointestinal toxicity ranged from 1.8 to 4.5 and from 1.2 to 2.3, respectively. The TER estimated for DDP-mediated general toxicities varied between 2.9 and 4.0 for weight loss, and from 2.0 to 2.3 based on the LD50. The differential effect of anaesthetics on TER calculated for antitumour activity and normal tissue toxicity led to different therapeutic ratios. For example the therapeutic ratio for combined WBH and DDP, using kidney damage as an end-point for normal tissue damage, ranged from 0.6 (without anaesthesia) to 1.6 (using nembutal as anaesthetic). The significantly elevated platinum levels in serum, kidney, jejunum and tumour tissue after WBH treatment may explain the thermal enhancement of DDP-mediated antitumour activity and side-effects but no correlation could be found for the differences in DDP-mediated normal tissue toxicities induced by the anaesthetics.
在F344大鼠模型中,于不同麻醉条件下,比较了全身热疗对顺二氯二氨铂(II)(DDP)介导的抗肿瘤活性及正常组织毒性的热增强作用。全身热疗(WBH:41.5摄氏度下120分钟)增强了DDP介导的抗肿瘤活性及毒副作用。我们目前的研究表明,麻醉剂可能会影响为DDP介导的正常组织毒性计算的热增强率(TER),但不会影响为抗肿瘤活性计算的TER。为DDP介导的抗肿瘤活性计算的TER为2.9。由于使用了麻醉剂,为肾脏毒性和胃肠道毒性计算的TER分别为1.8至4.5和1.2至2.3。为DDP介导的一般毒性估计的TER,基于体重减轻在2.9至4.0之间,基于半数致死量(LD50)在2.0至2.3之间。麻醉剂对为抗肿瘤活性和正常组织毒性计算的TER的不同影响导致了不同的治疗比率。例如,以肾脏损伤作为正常组织损伤的终点,WBH与DDP联合使用时的治疗比率范围为0.6(无麻醉)至1.6(使用戊巴比妥作为麻醉剂)。WBH治疗后血清、肾脏、空肠和肿瘤组织中铂水平显著升高,这可能解释了DDP介导的抗肿瘤活性和副作用的热增强,但对于麻醉剂诱导的DDP介导的正常组织毒性差异,未发现相关性。