Buckler H M, Critchley H O, Cantrill J A, Shalet S M, Anderson D C, Robertson W R
Department of Medicine, University of Manchester, Hope Hospital, UK.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1993 Feb;38(2):209-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1993.tb00995.x.
We evaluated the efficacy of ovulation induction using purified FSH in either low dose or conventional dosage in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome. We assessed whether gonadotrophin measurement by radioimmunoassay or immunoradiometric assay is a better indicator of whether pituitary desensitization with a GnRH agonist (Zoladex) has occurred.
Two different protocols were used. Pituitary desensitization was carried out with a GnRH agonist (Zoladex, ICI Pharmaceuticals UK). The patients were then randomized into one of two treatment groups. Conventional dose protocol: Patients commenced with a daily FSH (Metrodin, Serono Laboratories Ltd, UK) dose of 75 units for at least 7 days. The FSH dose was then increased, if necessary, based on ultrasound scans and plasma oestradiol (E2) levels in 75-unit increments. Low dose protocol: The same protocol was used except that the starting dose of FSH was 37.5 units daily with increments of 37.5 units.
Low dose protocol (six patients, six cycles). There was a high incidence of multiple follicular development (10.3 +/- 5.6 (+/- SD) follicles, 5.0 +/- 3.8 follicles > 14 mm in diameter). Three cycles resulted in ovulation, one was anovulatory and two patients underwent gamete intrafallopian transfer due to multiple follicular development. Conventional dose protocol (seven patients, eight cycles). Again there was multiple follicular development (10.1 +/- 8.6 follicles, 2.0 +/- 2.3 > 14 mm). Three cycles were ovulatory, one anovulatory, three abandoned due to multiple follicular development and one underwent gamete intrafallopian transfer with the development of severe hyperstimulation necessitating steroid therapy. There was no difference between the two protocols in the number of days of FSH administration (low dose protocol 26 +/- 6.5, conventional dose protocol 23 +/- 8.1 days), the total number of units of FSH given per patient was 2844 +/- 1816 vs 2635 +/- 1726. The peak E2 level (pmol/l) during FSH treatment was 3193 +/- 662 vs 2389 +/- 3099 and the rate of increase in the FSH dose in ampoules of Metrodin per day was 0.058 +/- 0.03 vs 0.057 +/- 0.03. All patients were 'downregulated' (E2 < 70 pmol/l) prior to ovulation induction. However, gonadotrophin levels (IU/l) were 4.3 +/- 1.5 (LH) and 2.8 +/- 1.2 (FSH) by radioimmunoassay and LH was unchanged throughout FSH treatment whereas LH measured by immunoradiometric assay was < 1.0 IU/l prior to ovulation induction and remained so throughout. The mean LH radioimmunoassay to immunoradiometric assay ratio was 6.2 +/- 2.1.
We conclude that regardless of the starting dose the use of pure FSH in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome whose LH has been completely down regulated may be associated with multiple follicular development and a poor outcome. LH measured by radioimmunoassay is not a good indicator of whether pituitary densensitization has occurred but LH measured by immunoradiometric assay appears to be. These results strongly suggest that a basic minimum amount of LH is necessary for normal ovulatory development.
我们评估了低剂量或常规剂量的纯化促卵泡激素(FSH)用于多囊卵巢综合征患者促排卵的疗效。我们评估了通过放射免疫测定法或免疫放射测定法检测促性腺激素是否是促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(诺雷德,英国帝国化学工业公司制药)使垂体脱敏是否发生的更好指标。
采用两种不同方案。用促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(诺雷德,英国帝国化学工业公司制药)使垂体脱敏。然后将患者随机分为两个治疗组之一。常规剂量方案:患者开始每日使用75单位的促卵泡激素(果纳芬,雪兰诺实验室有限公司,英国),至少使用7天。然后根据超声扫描和血浆雌二醇(E2)水平,必要时将促卵泡激素剂量以75单位的增量增加。低剂量方案:使用相同方案,只是促卵泡激素的起始剂量为每日37.5单位,增量为37.5单位。
低剂量方案(6例患者,6个周期)。多个卵泡发育的发生率较高(10.3±5.6(±标准差)个卵泡,5.0±3.8个直径>14毫米的卵泡)。3个周期导致排卵,1个周期无排卵,2例患者因多个卵泡发育接受了输卵管内配子移植。常规剂量方案(7例患者,8个周期)。同样存在多个卵泡发育(10.1±8.6个卵泡,2.0±2.3个>14毫米)。3个周期排卵,1个周期无排卵,3个因多个卵泡发育而放弃,1例因严重卵巢过度刺激需要类固醇治疗而接受了输卵管内配子移植。两种方案在促卵泡激素给药天数上无差异(低剂量方案26±6.5天,常规剂量方案23±8.1天),每位患者给予的促卵泡激素总单位数分别为2844±1816和2635±1726。促卵泡激素治疗期间的E2峰值水平(pmol/l)分别为3193±662和2389±3099,果纳芬安瓿中促卵泡激素剂量的每日增加率分别为0.058±0.03和0.057±0.03。所有患者在促排卵前均“下调”(E2<70 pmol/l)。然而,通过放射免疫测定法检测的促性腺激素水平(IU/l)为4.3±1.5(促黄体生成素)和2.8±1.2(促卵泡激素),促卵泡激素治疗期间促黄体生成素无变化,而通过免疫放射测定法检测的促黄体生成素在促排卵前<1.0 IU/l,且在整个过程中保持不变。促黄体生成素放射免疫测定法与免疫放射测定法的平均比值为6.2±2.1。
我们得出结论,对于促黄体生成素已完全下调的多囊卵巢综合征患者,无论起始剂量如何,使用纯促卵泡激素可能会导致多个卵泡发育且结局不佳。通过放射免疫测定法检测的促黄体生成素不是垂体脱敏是否发生的良好指标,但通过免疫放射测定法检测的促黄体生成素似乎是。这些结果强烈表明,正常排卵发育需要基本的最低促黄体生成素量。