Elements of causation in toxic tort litigation. Science and law must agree.
作者信息
Benjamin D M
出版信息
J Leg Med. 1993 Mar;14(1):153-65. doi: 10.1080/01947649309510908.
PMID:8463748
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Elements of causation in toxic tort litigation. Science and law must agree.
J Leg Med. 1993 Mar;14(1):153-65. doi: 10.1080/01947649309510908.
2
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: active judicial scrutiny of scientific evidence.
Food Drug Law J. 1995;50(2):213-34.
3
The learned intermediary doctrine: past, present and future.
Leg Med. 1994:269-80.
4
The federal preemption debate in pharmaceutical labeling product liability actions.
Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J. 2007 Fall;43(1):35-70.
5
The case against differential diagnosis: Daubert, medical causation testimony, and the scientific method.
J Health Law. 2004 Winter;37(1):85-111.
6
Federal preemption of common law tort awards by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
Food Drug Law J. 1996;51(4):509-611.
7
Science and the toxic tort.
Science. 1993 Sep 17;261(5128):1509, 1614. doi: 10.1126/science.8372345.
8
Lessons learned from good manufacturing practice noncompliance.
Food Drug Law J. 1995;50(1):65-70.
9
Contaminated dietary supplements.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 21;362(3):274; author reply 274. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0911467.
10
The case for preemption of prescription drug failure-to-warn claims.
Food Drug Law J. 2007;62(2):399-422.
Zotero 插件