Suppr超能文献

牙髓病学渗漏研究的重新审视。第一部分。方法、应用及相关性。

Endodontic leakage studies reconsidered. Part I. Methodology, application and relevance.

作者信息

Wu M K, Wesselink P R

机构信息

Department of Cariology and Endodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry, Amsterdam (ACTA), The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 1993 Jan;26(1):37-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1993.tb00540.x.

Abstract

An increasing number of endodontic leakage studies have been published. In the 1990 volumes of Journal of Endodontics and International Endodontic Journal, there was one leakage study to every 4.3 scientific articles. The most popular method was linear measurement of tracer (dye or radioisotope) penetration along a root filling. Comparing some data on linear measurement of dye penetration following the cold lateral condensation of gutta-percha that were published between 1980 and 1990, a high level of variation has been found, although the experimental methods used in these studies were quite similar. In almost all studies evaluating various techniques, the cold lateral condensation technique has been used as a standard control for comparison. The reliability of these results is questionable. The problems with such studies are discussed. It seems that more research should be done on leakage study methodology, instead of continuing to evaluate the sealing ability of different materials and techniques by methods that may give little relevant information.

摘要

越来越多关于根管治疗渗漏的研究被发表。在1990年的《牙髓病学杂志》和《国际牙髓病学杂志》中,每4.3篇科学文章就有一篇关于渗漏的研究。最常用的方法是沿根管充填物对示踪剂(染料或放射性同位素)渗透进行线性测量。比较1980年至1990年间发表的一些关于牙胶冷侧方加压充填后染料渗透线性测量的数据,尽管这些研究中使用的实验方法非常相似,但仍发现了高度的差异。在几乎所有评估各种技术的研究中,冷侧方加压技术都被用作标准对照进行比较。这些结果的可靠性值得怀疑。本文讨论了此类研究存在的问题。似乎应该对渗漏研究方法进行更多的研究,而不是继续用可能提供很少相关信息的方法来评估不同材料和技术的封闭能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验