Leoncini M, Sciagrà R, Bisi G, Santoro G M, Fazzini P F
Divisione di Cardiologia, Ospedale di Careggi, Firenze.
G Ital Cardiol. 1993 Feb;23(2):127-38.
The aim of this study was to compare in the same population of patients affected by coronary artery disease (CAD), the accuracy in the assessment of CAD extent and severity achieved by myocardial scintigraphy, performed using Tc-99m-MIBI with two different imaging techniques (planar and single photon emission tomography--SPECT) and using TI-201 SPECT and by equilibrium radionuclide angiography (RNV).
We studied 20 patients (18 men and 2 women, age range 42-74) without prior myocardial infarction, but with effort angina. Seven had one-vessel and 13 multi-vessel disease; coronary artery stenosis was > or = 70% and < 80% in 18 arteries and > or = 80% in 19. After therapy withdrawal, all patients underwent (in different days, within 2 weeks): SPECT exercise TI-201 myocardial scintigraphy (early and redistribution images), planar and SPECT Tc-99m-MIBI myocardial scintigraphy (exercise and rest imaging 24 hours apart) and RNV (baseline and exercise studies).
All methods were highly sensitive for the diagnosis of CAD: TI-201 SPECT 95%, Tc-99m-MIBI planar 95%, Tc-99m-MIBI SPECT 100%, RNV 100%. For the recognition of the involvement of more than one territory (multi-vessel disease) myocardial scintigraphy with Tc-99m-MIBI SPECT was the most sensitive (92%, p < 0.05 vs Tc-99m-MIBI planar and p < 0.01 vs RNV) and accurate (75%) method, while regional wall motion analysis with RNV showed the highest specificity (100%, p < 0.02 vs TI-201 SPECT, p < 0.05 vs Tc-99m-MIBI SPECT). For the recognition of the involved vessels Tc-99m-MIBI SPECT had the highest sensitivity (89%, p < 0.02 vs Tc-99m-MIBI planar, p < 0.002 vs RNV) and global accuracy (80%), while regional wall motion analysis with RNV had the highest specificity (96%, p < 0.02 vs Tc-99m-MIBI planar and SPECT, p < 0.001 vs TI-201 SPECT). The degree of obstruction (< 80% vs > or = 80%) significantly influenced the rate of positive RNV results (7/18 vs 14/19, p < 0.05), but not those of the different myocardial perfusion studies.
Our data show that clear differences among the tested methods are present with respect to the assessment of disease extent and severity. SPECT myocardial scintigraphy with Tc-99m-MIBI appears more accurate than the other methods for assessing the extent of CAD. RNV wall motion analysis shows a very good specificity for the recognition of multi-vessel CAD and for the detection of high grade obstructions. This encourages the efforts for studying, whenever possible, not only myocardial perfusion, but also ventricular function and regional wall motion. To this aim the collection of first-pass radionuclide angiocardiography at the moment of Tc-99m-MIBI injection could be particularly advantageous.
本研究旨在比较在同一组冠心病(CAD)患者中,使用两种不同成像技术(平面显像和单光子发射断层扫描——SPECT)的锝-99m-甲氧基异丁基异腈(Tc-99m-MIBI)心肌显像、铊-201(TI-201)SPECT心肌显像以及平衡放射性核素血管造影(RNV)在评估CAD范围和严重程度方面的准确性。
我们研究了20例患者(18例男性和2例女性,年龄范围42 - 74岁),这些患者既往无心肌梗死,但有劳力性心绞痛。7例为单支血管病变,13例为多支血管病变;18支动脉的冠状动脉狭窄≥70%且<80%,19支动脉的冠状动脉狭窄≥80%。在停止治疗后,所有患者在2周内的不同日期接受了以下检查:TI-201 SPECT运动心肌显像(早期和再分布图像)、平面和SPECT Tc-99m-MIBI心肌显像(运动和静息显像间隔24小时)以及RNV(基础和运动研究)。
所有方法对CAD诊断的敏感性都很高:TI-201 SPECT为95%,Tc-99m-MIBI平面显像为95%,Tc-99m-MIBI SPECT为100%,RNV为100%。对于识别多个心肌节段受累(多支血管病变),Tc-99m-MIBI SPECT心肌显像最为敏感(92%,与Tc-99m-MIBI平面显像相比p<0.05,与RNV相比p<0.01)且准确(75%),而RNV的室壁运动分析显示特异性最高(100%,与TI-201 SPECT相比p<0.02,与Tc-99m-MIBI SPECT相比p<0.05)。对于识别受累血管,Tc-99m-MIBI SPECT的敏感性最高(89%,与Tc-99m-MIBI平面显像相比p<0.02,与RNV相比p<0.002)且总体准确性最高(80%),而RNV的室壁运动分析特异性最高(96%,与Tc-99m-MIBI平面显像和SPECT相比p<0.02,与TI-201 SPECT相比p<0.001)。阻塞程度(<80%与≥80%)显著影响RNV阳性结果的发生率(7/18与14/19,p<0.05),但不影响不同心肌灌注研究的结果。
我们的数据表明,在评估疾病范围和严重程度方面,所测试的方法之间存在明显差异。Tc-99m-MIBI SPECT心肌显像在评估CAD范围方面似乎比其他方法更准确。RNV室壁运动分析在识别多支血管CAD和检测严重阻塞方面显示出非常好的特异性。这鼓励尽可能不仅研究心肌灌注,还研究心室功能和室壁运动。为此,在注射Tc-99m-MIBI时采集首次通过放射性核素心血管造影可能特别有益。