Langmuir V K, Fowler J F, Knox S J, Wessels B W, Sutherland R M, Wong J Y
Life Sciences Division, SRI International, Menlo Park, California 94025.
Med Phys. 1993 Mar-Apr;20(2 Pt 2):601-10. doi: 10.1118/1.597055.
This paper reviews the radiobiological aspects of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with radiolabeled antibodies, including comparisons between RIT and external beam irradiation. The effectiveness of cell killing by radiation decreases with the dose rate and the rate of decrease is determined by the size of the shoulder on the radiation survival curve. Tumors with poor repair capabilities exhibit less of a dose rate effect than tumors with good repair capabilities. Continued tumor cell proliferation during treatment occurs at very low dose rates and can contribute to the reduced effectiveness of low dose rate radiation. Toxicity to normal tissues will determine the total dose of radiolabeled antibody that can be given and this will be influenced by the choice of both the radionuclide and the antibody. The reported enhanced effectiveness of RIT may be due to multiple factors including selective targeting of cells responsible for tumor volume doubling, tumor surface binding rather than homogeneous binding throughout the tumor volume, targeting of the tumor vasculature, or block of cell cycle progression in G2. During RIT, there is less time for reoxygenation of hypoxic tumor cells than during a course of conventional external beam radiotherapy. It has not yet been determined whether this will have a detrimental effect on RIT. Probably the most important factor in the success of RIT is dose heterogeneity. Any viable portion of a tumor that is not targeted and does not receive a significant radiation dose will potentially lead to treatment failure, no matter how high the dose received by the remainder of the tumor. Comparisons between RIT and external beam radiation have shown a wide range of relative efficacy. Tumors most likely to respond to RIT are tumors with poor repair capabilities, tumors that are susceptible to blockage in radiosensitive phases of the cell cycle, tumors that reoxygenate rapidly, and tumors that express the relevant antigen homogeneously. From a radiobiological perspective, it appears that RIT alone is unlikely to cure many tumors and that combination with other treatment modalities will be essential.
本文综述了用放射性标记抗体进行放射免疫治疗(RIT)的放射生物学方面,包括RIT与外照射放疗的比较。辐射导致细胞杀伤的有效性随剂量率降低,降低速率由辐射存活曲线上的肩部大小决定。修复能力差的肿瘤比修复能力好的肿瘤表现出更小的剂量率效应。治疗期间肿瘤细胞的持续增殖发生在非常低的剂量率下,并且可能导致低剂量率辐射有效性的降低。对正常组织的毒性将决定可给予的放射性标记抗体的总剂量,这将受到放射性核素和抗体选择的影响。报道的RIT增强有效性可能归因于多种因素,包括对负责肿瘤体积倍增的细胞的选择性靶向、肿瘤表面结合而非整个肿瘤体积内的均匀结合、肿瘤脉管系统靶向或G2期细胞周期进程的阻断。在RIT期间,缺氧肿瘤细胞再氧合的时间比传统外照射放疗疗程中的时间少。尚未确定这是否会对RIT产生不利影响。RIT成功的最重要因素可能是剂量异质性。肿瘤中任何未被靶向且未接受显著辐射剂量的存活部分都可能导致治疗失败,无论肿瘤其余部分接受的剂量有多高。RIT与外照射放疗的比较显示出广泛的相对疗效。最可能对RIT有反应的肿瘤是修复能力差的肿瘤、在细胞周期放射敏感阶段易受阻断的肿瘤、再氧合迅速的肿瘤以及均匀表达相关抗原的肿瘤。从放射生物学角度看,似乎仅RIT不太可能治愈许多肿瘤,与其他治疗方式联合将至关重要。