Statement by DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Haemogenetics concerning the National Academy of Sciences report on DNA Technology in Forensic Science in the USA.
出版信息
Forensic Sci Int. 1993 Apr;59(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/0379-0738(93)90305-t.
PMID:8505025
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Statement by DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Haemogenetics concerning the National Academy of Sciences report on DNA Technology in Forensic Science in the USA.
Forensic Sci Int. 1993 Apr;59(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/0379-0738(93)90305-t.
2
DNA forensic science 1995.
Eur J Hum Genet. 1995;3(2):139-44. doi: 10.1159/000472286.
3
[Standards of DNA laboratories, criterium of Polish Society of Forensic Medicine and Criminology].
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2005 Jan-Mar;55(1):85-93.
4
Subjective interpretation, laboratory error and the value of forensic DNA evidence: three case studies.
Genetica. 1995;96(1-2):153-68. doi: 10.1007/BF01441161.
5
DNA fingerprinting: academy reports.
Science. 1992 Apr 17;256(5055):300-1. doi: 10.1126/science.256.5055.300.
6
Forensic nurse, crime experts, urge U.S. Senators to overhaul DNA analysis system.
Minor Nurse Newsl. 2002 Spring-Summer;9(2):1.
7
DNA fingerprinting reconsidered (again).
Sci Am. 1992 Jul;267(1):26. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0792-26a.
8
Chief says panel backs courts' use of a genetic test.
N Y Times Web. 1992 Apr 15:A1, A23.
9
Academy's about-face on forensic DNA.
Science. 1996 May 10;272(5263):803-4. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5263.803b.
10
Courts reject DNA fingerprinting, citing controversy after NAS report.
Nature. 1992 Oct 1;359(6394):349. doi: 10.1038/359349a0.
Zotero 插件