Zellweger J P, Anderhub H P, Langloh P
Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax. 1993 May 11;82(19):561-4.
35 asthmatic patients, aged from 23 to 73 years, participated in an open study aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerance of terbutaline and budesonide administered in similar amounts with a metered-dose inhaler fitted with a spacer (Nebuhaler) or by a powder inhaler (Turbuhaler). The patients used each device for seven weeks after a running-in phase of two weeks and gave at the end their preference for one or the other mode of administration. Among lung function values, the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) was significantly higher during the Turbuhaler period than during the period with metered-dose inhaler whereas the forced vital capacity, mid-expiratory flow rate and peak-flow morning and evening were not significantly different. The use of beta 2-bronchodilators and clinical scores were similar with a non-significant trend in favor of the Turbuhaler period. 25 patients on 35 expressed a preference for the Turbuhaler. The administration of terbutaline and budesonide by Turbuhaler is similarly or more efficient then the inhalation from a metered-dose inhaler with a Nebuhaler spacer and is preferred by a majority of patients.
35名年龄在23至73岁之间的哮喘患者参与了一项开放性研究,该研究旨在比较使用配有储雾罐(Nebuhaler)的定量吸入器或干粉吸入器(Turbuhaler)以相似剂量给予特布他林和布地奈德的疗效和耐受性。在经过两周的磨合期后,患者使用每种装置七周,并在最后表明他们对其中一种给药方式的偏好。在肺功能值中,使用Turbuhaler期间第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)显著高于使用定量吸入器期间,而用力肺活量、呼气中期流速以及早晚的峰值流速并无显著差异。β2-支气管扩张剂的使用情况和临床评分相似,有不显著的趋势表明Turbuhaler期间更具优势。35名患者中有25名表示更喜欢Turbuhaler。通过Turbuhaler给予特布他林和布地奈德与使用配有Nebuhaler储雾罐的定量吸入器吸入同样有效或更有效,并且受到大多数患者的青睐。