Spring A, Haczyński J, Jołda-Mydłowska B, Witkowska M
Katedry i Kliniki Kardiologii AM, Wrocławiu.
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 1995 Jul;94(1):47-58.
Chronic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is associated with depressed contractile performance, abnormal compliance of the chamber, and ultimately, the development of a left ventricular failure. Thus the presence of LVH carries a particularly ominous prognosis in patients with essential hypertension. Finally, regression of LVH appears to be a worthwhile goal of an antihypertensive therapy along with blood pressure control. Of particular importance, is whether the functional derangements associated with hypertrophy will also be reversed. The present study was undertaken to determine whether antihypertensive therapy reduced ventricular mass, and whether these changes were accompanied by improved diastolic function. 47 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension were divided into two groups. Group I--included 21 patients whose blood pressure responded to nifedipine monotherapy. Group II--included 26 patients whose normalization of blood pressure required combined therapy with nifedipine and metoprolol. 40 healthy volunteers comprised a control group. To assess the effects of antihypertensive therapy on the heart, left ventricular mas (LVM), systolic and diastolic function, by M-mode, 2-D and pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography had been evaluated. Measurements were performed before therapy and every 3rd month during first year, and every 40th month during the second year of observation. RESULTS. At baseline all hypertensive patients had significantly increased LVM compared to the controls. Indexes of systolic function in studied patients were normal, while indexes of LV diastolic filling were significantly abnormal compared to the controls. In the group treated with nifedipine, starting from the 9th month of observation, small but significant decrease in posterior wall thickness was noted but LVM did not change during the whole time of the observation. Similarly, there was no significant change in indexes of left ventricular diastolic filling. Contrary to patients treated with nifedipine, in group of patients treated with combination of nifedipine and metoprolol, significant reduction of LVM and improvement of LV diastolic filling was observed. Of particular interest was the fact, that improvement in diastolic, performance appeared earlier, and preceded regression of LVM. Most striking was the improvement in Ev/Av ratio which increased by 16% after 6 months and by 35% after 24 months of the therapy. CONCLUSION. 1. Combined therapy with nifedipine and metoprolol contrary to monotherapy with nifedipine alone, results in the regression of left ventricular mass and the improvement of left ventricular diastolic function. 2. Improvement of left ventricular diastolic function appears earlier, preceding the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy.
慢性左心室肥厚(LVH)与收缩功能降低、心室顺应性异常相关,最终可导致左心室衰竭。因此,LVH的存在对原发性高血压患者的预后尤为不利。最后,除了控制血压外,使LVH消退似乎也是抗高血压治疗的一个重要目标。特别重要的是,与肥厚相关的功能紊乱是否也会得到逆转。本研究旨在确定抗高血压治疗是否能减轻心室重量,以及这些变化是否伴随着舒张功能的改善。47例轻至中度原发性高血压患者被分为两组。第一组包括21例血压对硝苯地平单一疗法有反应的患者。第二组包括26例血压正常化需要硝苯地平和美托洛尔联合治疗的患者。40名健康志愿者组成一个对照组。为了评估抗高血压治疗对心脏、左心室质量(LVM)、收缩和舒张功能的影响,采用M型、二维和脉冲波多普勒超声心动图进行了评估。在治疗前以及观察的第一年每3个月、第二年每4个月进行测量。结果。在基线时,所有高血压患者的LVM均显著高于对照组。研究患者的收缩功能指标正常,而与对照组相比,左心室舒张充盈指标显著异常。在接受硝苯地平治疗的组中,从观察的第9个月开始,后壁厚度有小幅但显著的下降,但在整个观察期间LVM没有变化。同样,左心室舒张充盈指标也没有显著变化。与接受硝苯地平治疗的患者相反,在接受硝苯地平和美托洛尔联合治疗的患者组中,观察到LVM显著降低,左心室舒张充盈得到改善。特别值得注意的是,舒张功能的改善出现得更早,且先于LVM的消退。最显著的是Ev/Av比值的改善,治疗6个月后增加了16%,24个月后增加了35%。结论。1. 与单独使用硝苯地平单一疗法相反,硝苯地平和美托洛尔联合治疗可导致左心室质量消退和左心室舒张功能改善。2. 左心室舒张功能的改善出现得更早,先于左心室肥厚的消退。