Feingold A, Rounsaville B
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06519, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1995 Aug;39(2):99-109. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(95)01142-l.
This article used the diagnostic criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) to compare the validity of a qualitative and a quantitative model of the abuse-dependence distinction for different psychoactive substances in samples of drug users drawn from drug treatment inpatients, general psychiatric patients, and the community. The hypothesis that DSM-IV abuse criteria differ from dependence criteria in kind rather than degree (a qualitative model) was only occasionally supported by confirmatory factor analyses of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, by patterns of correlations of the two kinds of criteria with Addiction Severity Score (ASI) composites and measures of frequency of substance abuse, and by concurrent/prognostic validity analyses. However, the findings were consistent with a quantitative model of the abuse-dependence distinction that posits that abuse is a mild form of dependence. Whether abuse and dependence categories of users were established from separate DSM-IV criteria for abuse and dependence or from scores from a severity-of-dependence scale based on the pooled DSM-IV dependence and abuse criteria, abusers generally used drugs less than users in the dependence category and reported less problems associated with substance abuse on the ASI.
本文采用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)的诊断标准,比较了定性和定量模型在区分滥用与依赖方面的有效性,这两种模型针对的是来自药物治疗住院患者、普通精神科患者及社区的吸毒者样本中的不同精神活性物质。DSM-IV滥用标准与依赖标准在性质而非程度上存在差异这一假设(定性模型),仅偶尔得到DSM-IV诊断标准的验证性因素分析、这两种标准与成瘾严重程度评分(ASI)综合指标及物质滥用频率测量指标的相关性模式,以及同时效度/预后效度分析的支持。然而,研究结果与滥用-依赖区分的定量模型一致,该模型假定滥用是依赖的一种轻度形式。无论使用者的滥用和依赖类别是根据DSM-IV中单独的滥用和依赖标准确定的,还是根据基于合并后的DSM-IV依赖和滥用标准的依赖严重程度量表得分确定的,滥用者通常比依赖类别中的使用者使用药物更少,且在ASI上报告的与物质滥用相关的问题也更少。